« Judge in $54 Million Pants Suit Doesn't Think He Should Have to Pay Legal Fees | Main | Gitmo suspects UK wants freed are a threat »

Gay Marriage and Apartheid?

We, the crack young staff of "The Hatemonger's Quarterly," have certainly spied our share of inane bumper stickers. "Peace Is Patriotic"; "Bush Lied, Millions Died"; "So Many Right-Wing Christians, So Few Lions"--these are the sorts of slogans on back bumpers that strike us as absurd.

Accordingly, dear reader, it is not every day--or even every other day--that we happen upon a bumper sticker that perturbs us. Yet we recently took a gander at one that was really, really special.

The bumper sticker in question read: "End Apartheid: Support Marriage Equality." Quite frankly, this particular vehicular eyesore seemed so odd that we had to think twice about its curious message. "End Apartheid"? "Support Marriage Equality"? Doesn't that appear to be incongruous?

Now, we must admit that the use of the word "Apartheid" in political discourse compels our eyes to glaze over. After all, our anti-Israel friends have so horrifically misused the word when applying it to Zionism that it scarcely retains any meaning. To Jimmy Carter and his dubious minions, "Apartheid" apparently means "the existence of Israel."

We suppose it's not surprising, then, that some of those who support gay marriage would play the "Apartheid" card, even though it is almost bizarrely inappropriate. It seems odd that gay marriage proponents would strive to misuse the very word misused by Palestinian fanatics, given the brutal ways in which the Palestinians treat homosexuals. But this is just one example of leftist politics making strange bedfellows.

Although we, the crack young staff of "The Hatemonger's Quarterly," personally support gay marriage, we are routinely irked about the unfair way in which its partisans present the issue. If you ask us, those who disagree with us on this matter are not tantamount to Apartheid-backers and they aren't evil discriminators either.

In fact, it should seem obvious that opposition to gay marriage isn't discriminatory in the least. According to our current laws, every adult has the right to marry someone of the opposite sex. That's right: Every adult, whether he's straight, gay, bi-sexual, transgender, &c. This means that, by our current laws, everyone has the same exact rights. There's no discrimination at all.

Same-sex marriage proponents--among whom we count ourselves--believe that every adult should be accorded another right: The right to marry someone of the same sex. This would serve to augment everyone's rights, not end any sort of discrimination.

In essence, then, support for same-sex marriage amounts to support for a social transformation, one that we think desirable. Yet this sort of candor isn't likely to garner many votes and thus some have turned to unsavory scare tactics.

By all means, support gay marriage. But don't fool yourself into believing that you're "Ending Apartheid" at the same time. Thankfully, Apartheid no longer exists.

(Note: The crack young staff normally "weblog" over at "The Hatemonger's Quarterly," where they are currently "destroying fascism" by picking up litter in a public park.)


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments (3)

Like the saying goes, "At l... (Below threshold)

Like the saying goes, "At least you guys are honest about it". To your belief in the tooth fairy, uh, same sex marriage as a good and viable idea, one point of arguement: Maybe they wouldn't resort to such irrational tactics if they weren't encouraged to believe that such an irrational act, as marrying someone of the same sex, was something that all humanity has just happened to miss these past several thousand years of structured society.

You see ? Garbage in= Garbage out. It's very simple, go around with your whimpy, "Not that there's anything wrong with that", attitude and you end up with uppity homosexuals. Isn't it bad enough that we've been forced to deal with smarmy echo-pukes and holyer than thou smoke (and now, anything that tastes good) nazis ? Jeez, read the Bible, wouldja ?

We all know any real leagal... (Below threshold)
spurwing plover:

We all know any real leagal marrage is between one man and one woman and if the liberals cant reconnize that then they should just get a life

I'm not sure it is a libera... (Below threshold)

I'm not sure it is a liberal or conservative issue. Perhaps we're looking at it the wrong way. Garling Gauge has an interesting take on it that i'm still digesting:







Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile


Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links


Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy