« Choice Morsels | Main | Silence in Syria, Panic in Iran »

Business News Update

In addition to the UAW caving in and agreeing to that pro-management contract with GM there have been a veritable plethora of important business news items this week:

Goin' Nuclear

NRG Energy became the first power producer to submit formal plans for construction of a nuclear reactor since the dog days of the Carter/Three Mile Island malaise.

Three key items are responsible for this development: (1) high natural gas prices, (2) the landmark 2005 Energy Policy Act, (3) high regulatory costs associated with increasing capacity of existing fossil fuel plants. NRG's proposed nuclear plant is to be located in Bay City, Texas.

Presumably the lunatic left will engage in vicious litigation. But the courts in Texas are very conservative. So too is the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. The latter of which would decide potential liberal-bot claims against the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. In other words if the far left unleashes its lawsuit machine it's quite unlikely to find a sympathetic tribunal. In the event this issue went all the way up to the SCOTUS we'd be looking at a 5-4 decision against the Moonbats. Provided, of course, non-voting conservatives don't throw away the High Court when they stay home in droves next November.

Following in the wake of NRG's proposal will be nuclear power entreaties by Duke Energy and Dominion Resources.


Homebuilder Lennar posted a huge loss for Q3.

Back in early-2003 you could have purchased Lennar for under $30 a share (split adjusted). That's when the Lithium brigades were depressed about homebuilders and about the economy at large. Then in mid-2005 Lennar peaked at over $60 per share. That's when the Lithium brigades were happy about the housing markets and the economy, in general, and about homebuilders, in particular. Yesterday, however, Lennar closed at $21.80. The Wall Street Journal/CNBC drones again are depressed about the housing markets and about the economy too.

$25 - 2003 - financial media bearish
$60 - 2005 - financial media bullish
$21 - 2007 - financial media bearish

Moral of the story:

Being a media/market Lemming is no way to achieve financial independence.


President Bush soon will be getting another veto opportunity (go figure), as the Media/Democrat House of Representatives passed a pork spending/tax hike health care bill. Even the liberal airheads at the Associated Press have figured out there are not nearly enough votes to override the upcoming veto. So, in many respects this is much ado about nothing, although it does illustrate one of the ghastly measures for which many conservatives will be giving their tacit approval next year, when they "send their messages."

The roll call in the House broke down along the following party lines:

220 / 228 (96%) - Democrats in favor of more health spending
45 / 196 (23%) - Republicans in favor of more health spending

8 / 228 (4%) - Democrats opposed to more health spending
151 / 196 (77%) - Republicans opposed to more health spending


Courtesy of USA Today:

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services has expanded a Web-based system that allows employers to verify the legal status of new hires. About 23,000 employers are enrolled in E-Verify, USCIS Director Emilio Gonzalez said Tuesday.

The new tool allows employers to compare the photo on an applicant's green card or Employment Authorization Document against the photo in the agency's database. The plan is to expand the system to compare photos from other legal documents, such as driver's licenses and passports.

Some states require employers to use E-Verify.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is among critics who say the system has inaccuracies and rejects some applicants who are legally authorized to work in the USA.


Vonage had a worse week than Michael Vick.

A jury found the company infringed patents held by Sprint. An appeals court affirmed a prior courtroom defeat at the hands of Verizon. Its share price sunk below $1.00 (earlier this year it debuted at $17).

Guns + Butter

The Defense Department announced it wants a grand total of $190 billion in FY 2008 for Iraq and Afghanistan. Shares of defense contractors shot up.

Oil Money

Chevron announced it plans to buy back $15 billion of its own stock.

Oracle of Omaha

The word on The Street is that Warren Buffett is eyeing former icon Bear Stearns. Which makes sense. Buffett buys when others are selling. Buffett ignores the financial media and goes against the grain. Buffett didn't become the greatest stock investor of all time by accident.

Money + Politics

Eight of the 10 most expensive cities in the nation -- measured by average home sale prices -- are located in the Democrat-stronghold of California. Six of those eight are located in counties that vote overwhelmingly for Democrats. The other two cities in the top-10 are Greenwich, CT and Boston, Mass.

On the other hand, three of the 10 cities across the country with the lowest average home sale prices are located in the Republican stronghold of Texas. Two of those 10 are located in Kansas. The remainder of the top-10 least expensive cities are located, respectively, in: North Dakota, Indiana, Oklahoma, suburban Ohio, and suburban Michigan.

Which begs the following question:

Why do extremely-wealthy people vote for Democrats, whereas working class people not on government assistance vote for Republicans?

Oh, right, my bad, never mind. Back over to you, Katie Couric.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments (16)

Pebble Beds.========... (Below threshold)

Pebble Beds.

"Why do extremely-wealthy p... (Below threshold)
nogo war:

"Why do extremely-wealthy people vote for Democrats, whereas working class people not on government assistance vote for Republicans?"

Because working class people know the Republican Party has always been on their side.
Workers know the Republicans support Unions that allow them to be middle class.
The extremely rich know it is the Democrats that allow them the greatest tax breaks..
The extremely rich are CEO's and know the Democratic Party has no problem allowing their company to move outside the US to avoid taxes...so of course they support Dems
The only problem is that 2006 showed..and 2008 will show the majority of voters are extremely rich and/or on government assistance..(of course both are on govt assistance)

"Thanks to being the most productive workforce in America, and I might say, thanks to good policies, this economy is strong and it's getting stronger," Bush told supporters.

Noting that 68 percent of Americans own their own homes, Bush said, "Home sales were the highest ever recently. That's exciting news for the country."...President Bush May 6, 2004

Why do extremely-wealthy... (Below threshold)

Why do extremely-wealthy people vote for Democrats, whereas working class people not on government assistance vote for Republicans?

And why do neocons eat Christian babies?

Oh, my bad. Back to you, Brit Hume.

You can always tell when yo... (Below threshold)
P. Bunyan:

You can always tell when you've posted an "inconvenient truth" by the reaction of the leftist posters.

I meant "leftist commenters... (Below threshold)
P. Bunyan:

I meant "leftist commenters" (not posters)

"Noting that 68 percent of ... (Below threshold)
John F Not Kerry:

"Noting that 68 percent of Americans own their own homes, Bush said, "Home sales were the highest ever recently. That's exciting news for the country."...President Bush May 6, 2004"

Posted by nogo war

Funny thing about trying to use that stick to bash Bush: 2006 was the 5th best year ever in real estate. With all the alarmism out there, peopel are buying homes at near historical highs. But you wouldn't let any of those pesky facts get in the way, now would you, Nogo?

What kind of deals did the ... (Below threshold)
Spurwing Plover:

What kind of deals did the crooke of the UAW make?

Some sweeping, unsupported ... (Below threshold)

Some sweeping, unsupported generalizations:

-There are a lot of poor social conservatives, and they vote Republican
-A lot of rich people in those rich cities have liberal values (i.e. socially) and that's why they support a party that wants to spend more of their money. Consider doctors, lawyers, professors
-Wealthy people who support the Republicans are often small business owners who might actually need the tax cuts to stay rich (although moderately so). Most big businesses (and their executives) that support the GOP are in Republican cities like Houston

Not really trying to make an argument, just suggesting an explanation to Jayson's puzzlement with his own generalization.

astigafa, if you want to be... (Below threshold)

astigafa, if you want to be cute, doing so without using an anti-semitic blood libel would be a good idea.

Disliking neocons makes one... (Below threshold)

Disliking neocons makes one's opinion of semitic peoples transparent in the same way that one's taste for Nazis necessarily reflects their opinion of Christianity as a whole. SPQR, that's an unsupported leap from a sample of particulars to a much more general conclusion than logic entitles in this case. And, because so many idiots read blogs: I'm not saying neocons are Nazis; I'm saying moral indignation at astigafa's reductio of that part of Jayson's post is unsubstantiated and silly, and I feel comfortable using a silly analogy as illumination. This is off-topic, granted, but I'm just concerned that SPQR can't find a better reason to attempt to defend neocons other than the fact that some of them are Jewish.

hyperbolist ~ if you don't ... (Below threshold)

hyperbolist ~ if you don't "get" the part about "eating Christian babies" being an echo of antisemitic propaganda, just ask someone with greater familiarity with the subject. That apparently leaves you a wide selection.

Wow, use sweeping generaliz... (Below threshold)

Wow, use sweeping generalizations and hand-picked statistics to make you and the sinking ship that is the Republican party feel better in their time of darkness. Here's a thought: home prices are higher and the cost of living is greater because people would rather live on the California coast than Bumfuck, Kansas. That's just simple economics, retard.

Huh. I think of myself as s... (Below threshold)

Huh. I think of myself as somewhat of a neocon, and I'm no defender of astigafa (hell, I think I might have banned him at some point -- lemme check on that), and the first thing I thought of when I read his remarks was Swift, not anti-Semitism.

Huh. I don't recall clearly doing it, but certainly do remember the temptation on countless occasions. Guess I'll err on the side of leniency and let him continue until he does cross the line.


Well, now that Columbia has... (Below threshold)

Well, now that Columbia has put the survival of the jews on the negotiating table, it is not surprising that astigafa unveils his evil. Let's not be so passionate about it astigafa; we want this a well-reasoned decision.

hyperbolist, I don't think ... (Below threshold)

hyperbolist, I don't think your comment made much sense.

It was clever! At least, my... (Below threshold)

It was clever! At least, my mom thinks so...






Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile


Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links


Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy