« Why I never go shopping (unless I have to) | Main | Tancredo Drops Out, Endorses Romney »

McCain, Drudge, and the NYT

The Drudge Report is headlining a leaked New York Times story alleging Senator John McCain gave "special treatment" to a lobbyist for the telecommunications industry at some unspecified point in the past (presumably while he was Chairman of the committee overseeing that legislation). No details are yet available, but part of the Drudge story is that the McCain campaign, and the Senator himself, has urged NYT Editor Bill Keller not to run the story. McCain himself confirms contact, but denies they are "in talks" with the paper.

UPDATE 2:33 a.m. 21 Dec: The story Drudge suggested would break on the NYT front page today isn't there on the website, nor is any hint of the controversy. Drudge has now changed his report to say the reporter "hoped to break the story before Christmas" instead . . .

The specifics will come out, as they always do, and we can't really discuss them until they do. We can ask how Drudge managed to get the "scoop" on a pending NYT scandal story, though. Some are already pointing fingers at the Romney campaign, suspected of providing Drudge with "opposition research" in the past, but they do not answer the question of how Romney would know about a pending NYT story.

I can venture an educated guess, based on Drudge's own history. He has no real news-gathering operation himself, of course. His site posts links to stories posted elsewhere. His "scoops" have two main sources: from sites or reporters about to break a story, and hoping for the extra traffic and exposure Drudge can send them, and from reporters whose stories are languishing unpublished for one reason or another, as a way around their editors.

In fact, Drudge came to prominence in precisely the latter fashion. When Michael Isikoff, then with Newsweek, had the Monica Lewinsky story, his editors refused to run it immediately. Perhaps they wanted more confirmation, perhaps they didn't want to hurt Clinton, perhaps they just didn't believe it - the reason isn't relevant. Isikoff was afraid that any delay would mean someone else would break the story and "scoop" him, so he or someone close to him leaked the news to Drudge, then an obscure website. The rest, as they say, is history.

I suspect the same mechanism is being used here by the NYT reporters. Now, that paper hasn't been shy about running stories with flimsy verification in the recent past, but if this story was being held up, the reporter may have used Drudge for leverage, just as Isikoff and many others have since.

When an editor isn't satisfied with a reporter's sources or facts, he can tell him to get more confirmation, etc. But once he feels the reporter has spent enough time on the piece, he may just pull him and assign him to something else, figuring not to waste more time on it. If the reporter has a juicy enough tale to tell, though, Drudge will pick it up and run with it. Once it's in the public eye, other news operations will want to check it out. Now, the original editor knows he has a reporter who has already done the legwork, or most of it, so he can beat the crowd to print by running the story he originally canned. It's the journalistic equivalent of the "end around" play.

With McCain not only continuing his steady comeback in polling, but actually starting to move into contention nationally and perhaps even in Iowa (where he has long been written off), the moving sights of the media naturally home in on him. Given McCain's post-"Keating Five" history of battling for ethics, including his misguided Campaign Finance Reform Act, it is doubtful there is much depth to the story itself. If that's the case, being attacked by The New York Times might end up actually helping his campaign.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments (6)

and then there's also the t... (Below threshold)

and then there's also the target of the story who believes it's necessary to preempt the impending MSM coverage...

Don't forget the Drudge Edw... (Below threshold)
nogo war:

Don't forget the Drudge Edwards love child.

Assuming that many folks he... (Below threshold)
nogo war:

Assuming that many folks here believe that Rupert M...who just bought Dow Jones..and owns Fox is not a part of the what you call MSM.
Let's say you truly believe that Rupert does not have an agenda and a bottom line..
Let's even say Drudge was right with Clinton...
Do you take as gospel someone who was right once as someone who is is never wrong?
ya all trash left moonbat blogs all you want..
but they are very critical to Dems..maybe visit them
They don't suck up...
(Not that there is anything wrong with sucking up)

Holy shit, a politician is ... (Below threshold)

Holy shit, a politician is in league with Big Business! Is Tom DeLay available to coordinate a non-partisan investigation?

Representative politics necessarily involves graft and slime and greed, and the alternatives are worse. Democracy sucks (the least)!

We should see what the "spe... (Below threshold)

We should see what the "special treatment" McCain is alleged to have afforded the lobbyist is before rushing to a judgment one way or the other. On major issues, there are lobbyists on both sides most of the time. Some "lobbyists" have to win, no matter the outcome.

Did McCain let a lobbyist submit a brief to the Committee after a deadline? Ho-freakin'-hum. Did he allow the lobbyist to draft the bill? That might raise eyebrows, but so what if he did? Every Senator still could vote yea or nay on it, right?

So the "special treatment" alleged must be something very serious and scandalous.

The source is almost certai... (Below threshold)

The source is almost certainly a/the NYT reporter investigating McCain whose editors have judged that the story isn't there, despite all efforts to drum it up into a juicy story (note: these allegations about McCain have surfaced before -- the NYT wasn't investigating something new but trying to see if the darn thing actually could be nailed down as fact instead of allegation and as with past accounts was apparently having a hard time reaching that point). The real question of pertinence to Drudge is: Was McCain pressuring the NYT to spike the story? Dangerous territory, this; hope he has more than a disgrunted NYT reporter whose story didn't pass muster feeding him that line. Hope he has two sources on that one. The NYT at this point not only isn't running the supposed story on McCain, it's not backing Drudge up (and news outlets tend to go all out letting the world know a politician in particular is trying to be heavy-handed in what they do and don't report. That's its own news story in the media world when that happens aside from whatever it was the paper ostensibly was investigating.)






Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile


Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links


Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy