« Dems Debate the Surge | Main | McCain's new life »

Romney's new strategy

I've been analyzing Mitt Romney's chances for the Republican nomination based on the "early state strategy" his campaign put forth. Their concept was to win Iowa and New Hampshire, and gain enough favorable press coverage from those wins to vault him into contention nationally (where he languished in the low doubled digits at the time). Now that he lost Iowa badly and seems poised to lose New Hampshire as well, sources in the Romney campaign advise me the old strategy is no longer their model.

My first reaction was to recall Nixon Press Secretary Ron Ziegler's famous words, "That statement is no longer operable." [Insert your own gratuitous slap here].

On reflection, though, they have some logic in their argument. The original plan was designed to combat a dominant Rudy Giuliani, whose national support was in the upper 30s at the time. The early splash would be needed to position Romney to compete with him later. Facts on the ground changed, though: Rudy's support has steadily eroded to the point he is no longer a clear frontrunner. Any of the top five might conceivably win the nomination at this point, so Iowa and New Hampshire aren't the "must-win" contests they were in the older scenario.

I agree Romney's not out of it. In a race with six (including Paul) significant contenders, a candidate can stay viable with less impressive results than if it had become a two-man race early, and it's foolhardy to count out a guy with $250 million in the bank in what might boil down to a spending contest. Still, you can only move the goalposts downfield so many times . . .


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments (2)

I liked Romney's answers ... (Below threshold)

I liked Romney's answers in the debate last night. One thing I noticed about the body language - why is he smiling when others are talking? When McCain was going after him at one point, he was turning away and laughing. Didn't come across well.

I've already thrown a few dollars Fred's way. Fred needs to be a little quicker on the draw. His answers are thoughtful, but at times it feels like I am watching him as he is sitting around a senate conference room debating ideas. Give that man a Red Bull.

Good Lord, man, don't you s... (Below threshold)

Good Lord, man, don't you sleep at night?






Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile


Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links


Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy