« Bloggers Predicted McCain/Pawlenty in 2006 | Main | Wizbang Weekend Caption Contest™ »

Smelling Smoke In The Ayers

I like to consider myself a reasonably good writer, and one of the hallmarks of a good writer is the general avoidance of cliche's. But there's a reason why a phrase degenerates into a cliche': it's because it has more than a grain of truth. And as I consider the story of the relationship between Senator Barack Obama and unrepentant domestic terrorist Bill Ayers, and in particular the actions taken by Senator Obama's presidential campaign, I keep hearing certain tired and trite phrases:

"Where there's smoke, there's fire."
"When you find yourself taking the heavist flak, you know you're over the target."
"Methinks the lady doth protest too much."

And as much as I eschew cliche's, I also try to avoid conspiracy theories. Hell, some of my favorite pieces were aimed at debunking some of them. But there's enough in this matter for me to go out on a limb -- at least a couple of inches -- and say that there's something very, very suspicious going on here.

Here are the facts: Senator Obama and Bill Ayers have had at least some sort of political connections over the last 15 years or so, at various times and under various circumstances. Obama has, at every opportunity, downplayed and minimized this relationship, and dismissed concerns.

Ayers, for the record, was a leader of the now-defunct domestic terrorist group The Weather Underground. That group, who drew its name from a Bob Dylan lyric ("You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows"), were dedicated to the violent overthrow of the US government. They started out in the 1960's and remained active into the 1980's. They carried out a series of bombings, riots, and jailbreaks.

Fortunately, none of their bombings cost any lives. That changed when they were preparing a bomb in a townhouse in Greenwich Village in New York City. That bomb went off prematurely and killed three members. The bomb in question was a nail bomb -- one specifically designed not to just damage a building, but to kill and maim people, and was intended to be set off in a military social club.

Ayers spent several years underground, as a fugitive, during which time he married fellow Weather Underground member Bernardine Dohrn, before they surrendered to police. They were put on trial for their crimes, but the charges were dismissed because of police misconduct. Upon his release, Ayers described himself as "guilty as hell, free as a bird -- America is a great country."

Ayers is now a Distinguished Professor of English at the University of Illinois at Chicago, and a influential community activist. And he holds absolutely no remorse over his past -- indeed, he revels in it, boasting that "they didn't do enough."

Anyway, enough background. Who and what Ayers is is indisputable, but not the point I'm making here. What has been discovered by the investigations into the Ayers-Obama relationship, and even more importantly the reactions to those investigations, are what are drawing my attention.

Obama, initially, dismissed Ayers as "some guy from my neighborhood" and "someone I've met a few times." Then it turned out that Obama's first major political appearance was at a gathering in Ayers' home, where Obama was introduced to some of Chicago's major movers and shakers in the Democratic party machinery. Then it turned out that they had served together on a board. Then it came out that Obama had been both a board member and chairman of a foundation that Ayers had set up.

Now that the investigations have begun, though, it's the way that the Obama campaign has reacted that really has me fascinated. Their conduct is reaching near-Nixonian levels of paranoia.

One guy in Texas is so unhappy with the thought of Obama becoming president that he funded an ad discussing Obama's relationship with Ayers. The ad in question:

The Obama campaign is so incensed over this ad, they have launched attacks on TV stations that air it and even filed a legal complaint with the government over it, trying to get the American Issues Project shut down for alleged violations of election finance laws. And they even released an official campaign-sponsored ad in response to the American Issues Project ad:

As Ed Morrissey notes, there has to be a certain concern here from those concerned with civil rights -- if Candidate Obama is willing to go to such lengths to suppress his opponents, just what would President Obama do? But that's another issue -- perhaps even a more important one -- but not the one I'm addressing now.

Anyway, this is not the only troubling example of the Obama camp's overreaction on the Ayers matter.

Stanley Kurtz is a Harvard-educated social anthropologist, a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, and a frequent contributor to National Review. In other words, he's a scholarly conservative. He's been investigating the records of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, the organization set up by Ayers and run by Obama that I alluded to above. Obama first served as chairman of the board for four years, then stepped down to "member" for another three years, until it dissolved in 2002.

The group's records are currently held by the University of Illinois at Chicago, where Ayers teaches. When Kurtz first sought to see the records, he was granted permission. Then, when he actually showed up to look at them, he was turned away. Finally, the permission was re-granted, and he started poring over them.

And while he hasn't found any real bombshells (um... perhaps I shouldn't use that term when referring to Ayers, because he has a very real history with very real bombs) in them, he's provoked a virtual firestorm (there I go again) of a backlash from the Obama campaign.

The attacks on Kurtz are remarkable. He appeared on a long-running Chicago talk show to discuss what he had learned so far, and the Obama campaign coordinated an effort to jam the phone lines with "debunkers," armed with talking points that did all they could to bury what Kurtz had discovered thus far.

When I first started thinking about this, I found myself reminded of how the Obama campaign handled the whole "Obama's birth certificate" kerfuffle. When rumors first started circulating that there might be something about Obama's birth that would, somehow, disqualify him for the presidency or otherwise damage him, the Obama camp did exactly nothing. They could have ended the whole thing by simply releasing the actual certificate, but rather chose to ignore the whole thing for weeks.

I thought the whole thing was bullshit from the outset, and ignored it too. But as the heat grew and grew, I read one theory that explained perfectly what was going on, and it's one that I think is pretty close to true:

The Obama camp knew, immediately, that the whole birth certificate issue was bogus. It was a valid document, showing that Obama was born in the United States and a citizen thereof, and had nothing like a different name or declaration of religion or anything else. But someone in the Obama camp heeded Napoleon's legendary counsel to "never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake," and let the nuts run with the story for weeks, knowing that all the energy poured into this red herring would be energy that would not be funneled into other, more potentially fruitful, alleys.

Of course, this gives the Obama camp credit for more brains than they've exhibited in other areas, but I'm willing to extend them that much credit.

So, could this bit about Ayers be another form of diversion? To convince the most fervid anti-Obama folks that there really might be something worth digging? That there, as the old joke goes, really be a pony under that big pile of horse manure?

I don't think so.

With the birth certificate mess, the Obama camp did literally nothing. They just refused to cooperate. Hell, they refused to acknowledge that there was any kind of question at all.

In the Ayers matter, they are not just ignoring it. They are taking active steps to put down the investigations. They produced the above ad dismissing the American Issues Project ad. They are trying to get the government to shut down the AIP. And they are rallying their followers to hound and harass Stanley Kurtz.

This much energy focused on this one matter has my spider-sense tingling. If this is, indeed, merely a gambit like they played with the birth certificate issue, then it's a damned expensive one. And risky, too -- the tactics they are using are very heavy-handed, and do not reflect well upon Obama himself.

Kurtz has found some fairly interesting things in his digging into the records of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge thus far -- for example, one program to teach math to kids was rejected, while a Maoist and former Ayers crony got a grant for $175,000 to run the "Small Schools Workshop." Kurtz has also uncovered minutes of numerous meetings where both Obama and Ayers were in attendance.

The Obama camp is acting precisely like you'd expect them to act if they knew -- or at least believed -- that there was something devastating to Obama in his relationship with Ayers. And Obama has already been caught downplaying and minimizing and misleading the nature of his relationship with Ayers.

No, I don't know just what that might be. Hell, I don't know if it even exists. But I wholeheartedly believe that we need to keep looking into the matter -- because, if nothing else, as Ed Morrissey noted, it's giving us a priceless insight into how a President Obama would handle adversity -- and before he has the full power of the executive branch of the government at his disposal.

That, alone, is worth its weight in gold.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Smelling Smoke In The Ayers:

Comments (17)

it's giving us a pric... (Below threshold)

it's giving us a priceless insight into how a President Obama would handle adversity

Good post Jay.

The Ayres problem resonates, hence the fumbling, paniced response by the Obama campaign this week.

Obama's folks have a tendency to go over the top, to overreach. In a strange way Berlin was an example of that.

This week we saw them do it on a more substantive issue with Ayres. Contacting the United States Department of Justice twice in two days and demanding a criminal investigation while providing no evidence of even civil illegality is a desperate action and it is frightening.

Senator Obama wants to do t... (Below threshold)

Senator Obama wants to do things that the left were asserting that Bush and Cheney were supposedly doing the past 7 years.

A reprint from a previous p... (Below threshold)

A reprint from a previous post that bears repeating

There's another reason why Obama's relationship with William Ayers matters. It shows ,what I call a pattern of association. Ayers is a Marxist who rails against the capitalist system. He also says that America's greatest sin lies in it's "white supremacy". Does this sound familiar?..Rev. Wright preaches Black Liberation Theology which has at it's core..Marxism. And we all know that he too believes that America is predicated on the premise of white supremacy. It shouldn't surprise anyone that Obama had a close relationship with Ayers. After all don't you know..birds of a feather....

Senator Obama wants to d... (Below threshold)

Senator Obama wants to do things that the left were asserting that Bush and Cheney were supposedly doing the past 7 years.

Democratics have always been good at projection. They assume the worst about Republicans because in a similar situation they know they would be doing terrible things.

"[I]f Candidate Obama is... (Below threshold)

"[I]f Candidate Obama is willing to go to such lengths to suppress his opponents, just what would President Obama do?"

I can't help but think this reaction is reminiscent of the Clintons every time someone angered them. They treated the IRS as though they had them on retainer. Perhaps a President Obama would prefer to use the Justice Department in the same manner.

As Larry Johnson has shown, their complaint suggests a certain level of incompetence though. It's as though they've gone at it only half heartedly. The AIP publicly posted 167 pages of documentation and research (with full articles and entire transcripts) in support of the ad and supplied it to the station airing the ad as well. The Obama camp, in turn, writes a two and a half page memorandum with "with twelve footnotes, three of which are to AIP's own research."

I would say that while it appears they have little of substance, most of their reaction has consisted of the three Bs you attributed to Biden; Bully, Bluster and Bullshit.

Bully: Sick the Justice Department on them.
Bluster: Send out letters to supporters whipping them into a frenzy assassinating Kurtz's character rather than addressing the issue.
Bullshit: "He was only 8 years old."

Oyster, I am tremendously f... (Below threshold)

Oyster, I am tremendously flattered at the Biden 3 B's callback, but this IS the same Larry Johnson who was hyping the Michelle Obama "whitey" tape...

Hmm... could there be a connection? Could the "whitey" tape be from the Annenberg records?

Nah. Not bloody likely. Fun thought, but extremely improbable.


I do believe, in spite of e... (Below threshold)
2T3MzooK Author Profile Page:

I do believe, in spite of everything, that there is something to the birth certificate issue (though maybe not what people were thinking), and we have already seen some of the smoke. The thing is, there has not been much tinder extant.

That may soon change, and it will be paper fuelling the inferno.

In the Ayers matter, the... (Below threshold)

In the Ayers matter, they are not just ignoring it. They are taking active steps to put down the investigations.

Same deal with the Frank Marshall Davis stuff. They're pushing back hard on that one, too, but, again, not on the facts. They're attacking the messengers (Cliff Kincaid's getting hammered over the heavy lifting AIM's been doing), starting to allow trickles in the press (but not rebuting the actual charges), and, of course, their foolish 40-page 'response' to the Obama book (that never manages to rebut most of the actual accusations, what with most of them being supported by Obama's books and all).

Jay, I'm not touting Larry ... (Below threshold)

Jay, I'm not touting Larry Johnson. With the link, I'm pointing to the site where AIP's letter is posted. I referenced only the information from a letter posted in an article not even written by Larry Johnson. I did assume it was his article though. Sorry for the confusion.

As an aside, I had forgotte... (Below threshold)

As an aside, I had forgotten all about the "whitey" tape thing. I dismissed it as soon as I heard it.

Obama is a Chicago politici... (Below threshold)
Larry Summers:

Obama is a Chicago politician. Chicago is not a place, it is a state of mind. As the current Mayor of Chicago said with regard to Ayers-Obama friendship, "So what."

The mantra of Chicago politics is money, jobs and power. The Chairman of an Organization and the money raiser combine to equal power, which translates into money disbursed to those who can insure the continuation of power. Ayers was the money raiser. Obama was the Chairman front; black guy and lawyer and community activist without Ayer's baggage.

Somewhere along the line, Obama learned to manage a complex business. He has done well in managing the business of his campaign. We can caterwaul all we want about Obama's defects and there is plenty there, but don't underestimate his ability to sway masses of people and direct his campaign machine correctly. The question is, given his history, where did he learn to manage complex business? My guess is as the Chairman of the group Ayers raised money for. There was lots of money floating around and much competition for it.

An unrelated (sorta) question is floating around in my mind and that is; how did an unrepentant terrorist get a job as Professor at UofI? And how does he keep it? Is it the Annenbergs behind him? Why? What skeletons in which closet does Ayers protect in exchange?


Excellent review JT. Just ... (Below threshold)

Excellent review JT. Just where is 60 minutes on this thing?

The problem is- The ... (Below threshold)

The problem is- The propagandists at the UIC Library gave professor terrorist Ayres 48 hours to "cleanse" the documents BEFORE they were released.

More Clintonian evidence tampering subterfuge, just like the Rose Law Firm billing records, the Vince Foster papers, and the stained blue dress.. oh wait, that one got past them.

Welcome to the "new" Obama regime. Stalin, Hitler and George Orwell would heartily approve.

To Larry. One key to power ... (Below threshold)
Chester Himel:

To Larry. One key to power and money in Chicago is Thomas Ayers (father of Bill and ex CEO of Commonwealth Edison) The cesspool of corruption in Chicago includes Univ of Chicago, Univ of Ill. at Chicago, Northwestern Univ. (Chicago. Bill Ayers at UIC, his wife at Northwestern (Chicago) and Michelle Obama at UC. UC (Hospital) raised Michelle from 112,000 to 300,000 and Sen Obama earmarked 1,000,000 tax dollars to UC(Hospital), thus, the Univ. of Chicago passed through some $600,000 Fed money to Michelle (so far)

Very good insight. I'm stil... (Below threshold)

Very good insight. I'm still not sure Obama is even qualified to run for President. It's never been adequately checked. Obama the Totalitarian--it's the Chicago Politics method! The COLB on the internet IS a fake. What does that tell you?

And let's not forget how th... (Below threshold)

And let's not forget how they handled Obama's gay lover Larry Sinclair. In May, Joe's son, Beau Biden, had him arrested at his press conference in an effort to silence him. The reporter that breaks this story will win a Pulizter.

Let's talk about bombs. Th... (Below threshold)

Let's talk about bombs. The ones Bill Ayers was personally connected with killed no one. The ones John McCain personally dropped killed thousands. When is someone going to make him answer for those?

This attempt to connect Bill Ayers and Barack Obama is a feeble attempt by the ultra right to hide the fact that John McCain has no positions he wants to talk about with the American voter.






Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile


Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links


Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy