« Obama On O'Reilly: Dreams He Never Had | Main | Ann and Nancy Wilson Send Cease and Desist Letter to McCain/Palin »

The Most Frightening Type Of Change

While listening to the criticism of Sarah Palin, I've paid attention to the things she is criticized for -- and, in some way, even more closely to the things that are not brought up. And that, often, says more about the critics than what they do say.

To me, one of Palin's most powerful credentials is how she has handled corruption within Alaskan government. After losing the race for Lieutenant Governor, she was offered a "consolation prize" as chair of the Alaska Oil And Gas Commission, as well as its Ethic Supervisor.

That was, apparently, meant to mollify her and keep her out of trouble. The problem was, she actually took it seriously. So seriously, she led an investigation into the chairman of the Alaskan Republican Party that ultimately cost him $12,000 in fines for conducting party business on the state dime. She also forced the resignation of the state's Republican attorney general.

That didn't go over so well, so the good-old-boy network decided to force her out. And they did -- but that was probably the dumbest thing they could have done. (Almost as dumb as giving her that job in the first place.) She went, but she didn't go quietly -- her letter of resignation detailed just how much corruption she had uncovered, but hadn't managed to resolve.

And she named names.

Suitably fired up, she then ran for governor against the incumbent Republican, Frank Murkowski, the very powerful former Senator. And in a very nasty primary, she won over half the votes in a five-way race that Murkowski himself came in third with less than 20 percent of the vote.

From there, she took on the Democrat, former governor Tony Knowles by over seven and a half point.

I've said it before, and I'll repeat it here: to become governor, Palin had to take out both a sitting governor and a former governor -- in the same year. And she did it.

She also led to major overhauls in government ethics and disclosure, reaching across the aisle, drawing together Republicans and Democrats to pass one of the strictest ethics laws in the nation.

As popular as reformers are with the people, they are anathema to most career politicians and partisan hacks. Their party mates fear that the reformer will draw a target on them, and worry about them becoming "loose cannons."

It's the members of the opposing party, though, that have an even more interesting attitude towards reformers. And that's the insight Palin has given me.

(For the sake of simplicity, I'm going to use Palin as a specfic example. The converse holds true, but saying the following in a generic sense makes for cumbersome phrasing. Feel free to substitute a Democratic reformer for Palin, and reverse the parties in the following.)

The first reaction of the Democratic machine to someone like Palin has to be fear. After all, look at what she did to members of her own party. What sorts of restraint would she show towards Democrats?

The second reaction, though, is far more subtle and subversive, and escaped me until recently. Another reason the most partisan Democrats fear and resent Palin is that she is taking away their favorite toys.

They'll never admit it, but the most partisan hacks of both parties LOVE IT when a member of the opposition is tainted with scandal. They love having that figure to constantly point at, to refer to, to mock and deride the corrupt pol and those associated with him or her, for as long as they can.

You want examples? Look at the most common names when it comes to political corruption and malfeasance. Representative William Jefferson. Jack Abramoff. Ted Kennedy. Duke Cunningham. Kwake Kilpatrick. Bob Ney. Bill Clinton.

For all the denouncements they collect, they serve a critical role for their political opponents as convenient punching bags and constant reminders that the other side can be horribly corrupt and venal and vile.

Well, Palin ruined that for her opponents in Alaska. She took on -- and took out -- the state's attorney general, the chairman of the party, and the sitting governor. She took them off the board, depriving Democrats of the opportunity to use them against her, and Republicans in general. Her cleaning the Republicans' house took away one of the Democrats' favorite tactics.

And that's what happens with reformers: they are a brutally Darwinian force in politics, tearing away at the weaker elements of their own party. But after the wounds they inflict heal, and end up stronger than they were before. And that is something that the most partisan people fear: while they revel in the exposure of corruption in their opponents, the last thing they want is for the corrupt to be purged. They want them to stick around, to continue being a festering open wound that will drain the strength and vitality of their opposition.

That, far more than anything else, explains just why so many Democratic party apparatchiks and activists and apologists fear people like Sarah Palin. And that is the reason that they will never confess to, because it reveals their true nature: how they almost always put party ahead of principle.

That's the attitude Sarah Palin found when she was fobbed off on the Oil and Gas Commission, and found she was expected to "go along to get along." She didn't play that game now, and she shows no sign of being willing to play it now.

So that is why she must be stopped, at any cost. And that is why you will never, never, never hear the real reason from her staunchest critics -- because she represents what they fear most.

Is it a valid fear? Is she really the champion riding to Washington on a white charger? (Or, perhaps, a white snow machine?) I don't think so. I think she, like most people, is human, and while she has a particular bee in her bonnet for political corruption, that is not her sole purpose in life. She has other issues and priorities, and occasionally puts her attention on those as well.

But she could be that kind of nightmare, and that mere potential is more than sufficient to scare the crap out of some of her opponents.

And some of her nominal allies.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Most Frightening Type Of Change:

» Wizbang linked with Change That's Only Skin Deep

» The Thunder Run linked with Web Reconnaissance for 09/05/2008

Comments (8)

Ms. Smith Goes to Worshingt... (Below threshold)

Ms. Smith Goes to Worshington.

JT, spot on. Very well said... (Below threshold)

JT, spot on. Very well said. Thanks. ww

Been saying this for 6.5 da... (Below threshold)

Been saying this for 6.5 days now, Sarah frightens the Dims because she cleans up corruption, what the Dims say they do, but, just cant seem to get around to.

I've mentioned this before ... (Below threshold)

I've mentioned this before but I think it's worth mentioning again, just because it fits so well with what you just said, Jay:

The biggest narrative surrounding Barack Obama is "hope and change." Obama has been elevated to an ubermensch stature as a gifted leader with the ability to rise above the corruption and partisan nature of politics in order to bring everyone together and guide them toward solutions to problems based on "common good," rather than political power (this is community organizing lingo, by the way). They even use the word "post-partisan" to describe him, suggesting again that his approaches to problem solving will be above and beyond any efforts that we mere mortals have ever witnessed.

The problem is this -- if the far Left actually believed that Barack Obama would do these things, they would be scared shitless of him, because the last thing they want is someone who will make nice with the enemy (conservatives) and work with them and perhaps even incorporate (and acknowledge!) some of their ideas.

The fact that the far Left worships Obama gives lie to the post-partisan "change" meme, because the only "change" they want is a complete reversal of current policies that will incorporate 100% liberal ideas, promoted by leadership that is able to either charm or intimidate opponents into submission.

GianiD -That's bec... (Below threshold)

GianiD -

That's because the Democratic Party isn't about DOING, it's about PROMISING.

They'll promise to end the war. To make the schools better. To end corruption. They'll promise a comprehensive energy plan. They'll promise a chicken in every pot, or pot in every chicken, or something wonderful for everybody paid for by the 'rich'.

And the day after the election, the promises will be filed away to be pulled out, dusted off, repainted and touted as "NEW! Brand NEW! Something to BELIEVE in!" when needed for the next election.

But never, ever to be solved. You can't buy a vote by promising to solve something that's already fixed.

Mike -The fact ... (Below threshold)

Mike -

The fact that the far Left worships Obama gives lie to the post-partisan "change" meme, because the only "change" they want is a complete reversal of current policies that will incorporate 100% liberal ideas, promoted by leadership that is able to either charm or intimidate opponents into submission.

The charm's wearing thin, and what are you going to do against a candidate who refuses to be intimidated? She's not following the damned script - she should have freaked and bailed by now! Instead, she's eating it up and enjoying it - she's not playing fair!

Since you mentioned Abramof... (Below threshold)

Since you mentioned Abramoff - I see that he just got 4 years. Interestingly I see that he was facing 11, but got credit for helping investigators. Hey, how come nobody's got a post up about Kwame?

Here, in essence, is what t... (Below threshold)

Here, in essence, is what the Palin pick, her repulsive treatment by the left and her tremendous speech did:


(Comes from the final episode of Justice League Unlimited. Just think of the nattering nanobs of the left as Darksied and the rest of us, with pent up fury, as Superman.)






Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile


Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links


Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy