« Are you ready for 2012? | Main | Last Week's Weekend Caption Contest™ Winners »

Will Chaput Be Kaput After Criticizing Obama?

After Archbishop Charles Chaput criticized Obama on right to life issues, it is sadly not pure fantasy to wonder if he will get a Joe the Plumber-like deep background vetting and the accompanying media beat down.

Denver Roman Catholic Archbishop Charles Chaput labeled Barack Obama the "most committed" abortion-rights candidate from a major party in 35 years while accusing a Catholic Obama ally and other Democratic-friendly Catholic groups of doing a "disservice to the church."

Chaput, one of the nation's most politically outspoken Catholic prelates, delivered the remarks Friday night at a dinner of a Catholic women's group.

His comments were among the sharpest in a debate over abortion and Catholic political responsibility in a campaign in which Catholics represent a key swing vote.

While Chaput has won praise from traditionalist Catholics for stressing opposition to abortion as a foundational voting issue, voices on the Catholic left have sought to apply church teachings to war, poverty, the environment and other issues.

I am a practicing Catholic, and I have witnessed this attempt at interpreted application of "Catholic social teachings" to political choices first hand. It was and is disturbing.

For instance, two weeks ago it was "Right To Life Weekend," and my pastor could bring himself to mention this only as a way to stress - in the same sentence - that Catholics must not become single issue voters. He stressed that Catholics must apply the Church's social teachings and apply them to other things, "such as the morality of war."

Our priest is very liberal politically and has made his profound dislike of George W. Bush and his administration plainly known. And it was within this political context that his words were interpreted as an advocation for Barack Obama, even though he was careful enough to add that it is not the role of the Church to advise on whom parishioners should vote for.

I was quietly incensed, angry at the less-than-deft attempt to encourage a particular vote while mechanically stating this was not being done. It was Right To Life Weekend. And the only mention it got was to ensure we parishioners did not get too excited about it, lest we put abortion too high on our list of concerns or perceived electoral responsibilities. That was it. No discussion of the abortion issue at all on this weekend. It was surely too close to an election to allow that to go mucking up the vote.

Our pastor has made it known (less than explicitly yet unmistakably) that he - and other officers of the church - believe socialism is the system of governance that God favors most, based on their perceptions of its charity. Unfortunately, poverty still exists as equitably in socialist countries as it does here in America; an inconvenient fact lost on do-gooders who seem to think an economy is a zero-sum equation.

I wanted to scream out, "Tell them about the Chaldean and Assyrian Catholics whom al-Qaeda has been busy trying to exterminate if you want to talk about the morality of war! Or perhaps let's talk about the need to at least protect the lives of infants who somehow survive abortions by the Grace of God and are born alive! It is Right to Life Weekend not Single Issue Voter Admonition Weekend!" I was boiling, my face red and my hands now clasped in a white-knuckle clench behind my back as I stood at the back of the church. (I am an usher.)

But I held my tongue. Archbishop Chaput would have a field day with my priest. My priest is a genuinely good and charitable man by any other measure, but he fails singularly here - and badly in my view. I said to my wife that I think, in his envisioned perfect world, there would be no abortion and a socialist government in America. That, unable to have both simultaneously, he has chosen to advocate socialism (regardless its inability to eliminate poverty) and averted his eyes from abortion.

He is not alone. And the Left knows this, as the Obama campaign makes plainly clear in response to Archbishop Chaput's criticism of the Left in general and Barack Obama in particular.

Mark Linton, the Obama campaign's Catholic outreach coordinator, said in a statement Saturday that Obama is "proud to have the support of so many committed Catholics who are hungry for real change after eight years of failed policies. He has offered Americans real solutions even on tough issues like abortion, where we can come together to teach our kids responsibility and self-respect, to prevent unintended pregnancies, and offer strong support to women."

Well, they're not real Catholic solutions, and he knows it. And so does my priest.

In order to "come together to teach our kids responsibility and self-respect, to prevent unintended pregnancies, and offer strong support to women," is abortion really a pre-requisite? How "committed" are Obama's Catholic supporters if they think so?

I believe that many, when pondered in deep introspection, do not. But instead, like my priest, they avert their eyes in popular quest for a "change" to socialism.

I would also suggest that to the souls of the unborn - and to the souls of the born who have been left to die - abortion is not necessary "to teach our kids responsibility and self-respect, to prevent unintended pregnancies, and offer strong support to women." It is, they surely would scream out, ultimately an existential affront to each of these.

But those are the voices we can only hear when we close our eyes, as we have closed theirs.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments (5)

The politicization of the p... (Below threshold)

The politicization of the pulpit is among the bitterest things American Catholics must swallow to remain in their Church. Clerics of every rank seem to have forgotten that their calling is to Christ, not to Caesar -- an especially ironic matter when the Sunday Gospel reading was the "Render unto Caesar" episode.

At some point, the Church has to awaken to the harm it's doing itself. We can pray for it, anyway.

I would have been tempted t... (Below threshold)

I would have been tempted to ask the priest how may people died as a result of US military action last year vs. how many abortions did we have last year?

I also would have been tempted to remind him that he lives as part of a quasi-socialist organization made up of people who live that way voluntarily. And even then it relies on the infusion of outside cash from the outside (nearly all capitalists) to exist.

Steve:Of late, the... (Below threshold)


Of late, the writings of Thomas Sowell have inspired me.

I have taken on my local Parish Priest lately for some of his attitudes. It is not a zero sum game we have in this world, it is a matter of trade offs and the greatest good. Saving one life at the expense of the multitudes is nice for the one life, and an early death for the rest as an example.

In discussions with said Priest, I take the line that in things spiritual, he is the proven expert and I am the humble supplicant. But in things worldly, I challenge his expertise. It is his job to help his flock to make it to Heaven, not to line them up for another experiment in socialism that is doomed before it even gets off the ground.

Steve,The day will... (Below threshold)


The day will come when the Catholic Church is bashed for "not doing enough" to end abortion, much as it is often criticized for "not doing enough" to end the Holocaust. And American Catholic bishops will be roundly condemned for their failure to take definitive action, much as Pope Pius XII is condemned by many today. Whether or not that condemnation is fair will be the subject of much debate, but "we were afraid of losing our tax status" will not make a convincing defense.

Suggested reading for your ... (Below threshold)

Suggested reading for your pastor and all other pro-abortion Catholics: Condition of the Working Class, Encyclical Letter Rerum Novarum, May 15, 1891: "Hence it is clear that the main tenet of Socialism, community of goods, must be utterly rejected, since it only injures those whom it would seem meant to benefit, is directly contrary to the natural rights of mankind, and would introduce confusion and disorder into the commonweal. The first and most fundamental principle, therefore, if one would undertake to alleviate the condition of the masses, must be the inviolability of private property." Socialism is contrary to Catholic teaching. God bless this country.






Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile


Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links


Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy