« Not all Experience is Good Experience | Main | Hold the pickles, hold the lettuce »

Apparently there's not enough equality in suicide for feminists

You wouldn't think feminists would whine about more men committing suicide than women, but hey, never underestimate their ridiculousness. Over at Feministing, apparently they're upset that an MSNBC article is chronicling the uptrends in male suicide due to economic pressures. Here's an excerpt from the MSNBC article:

The numbers are so gut-churning, it's like looking over a bridge railing. Nearly 26,000 men took their own lives in 2005. That's nearly four times the number of women who did the same thing, even though three times more women than men attempt suicide. (For every completed suicide by a man or woman, 25 attempts fail.)

Whereas a woman might swallow pills halfheartedly, a man is four times more likely to complete the act, mostly because men tend to use guns -- and their aim is true. As grim as that sounds, it gets worse. Mark S. Kaplan, Dr.P.H., who researches suicide at Oregon's Portland State University, believes the suicide death toll may be up to 25 percent higher than officially recorded. Many single-car accidents seem mysterious. When an overdose occurs and toxicology results are ambiguous, as in the case of Heath Ledger, was it a tragic accident or an exit strategy? Some medical examiners will certify a death as suicide only if the victim leaves a note, and yet only about 20 percent of people who kill themselves do so. Sometimes insurance companies pay the survivors less, or nothing at all, in cases of suicide. The denial of friends and family is a factor, too: It's less painful to think a loved one didn't die by his or her own hand.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Violent Death Reporting System, which tracks the circumstances surrounding violent deaths (including suicides), might be able to sort all this out -- if it were funded in more than 17 states.

There's always an internal detonator with suicide, but an external spark helps light the fuse. One factor that comes along every few generations is economic distress. During the Great Depression, when banks went bust and people's life savings vanished, suicide rates soared. Another instigator: large numbers of veterans returning from armed conflict, many of them with troubled (or injured) minds, lousy job prospects, and fractured families. Which begins to explain why suicidologists, who study the phenomenon, are feeling a little edgy themselves these days. "For those who serve in the military, the suicide risk may be even greater considering multiple deployments, possible brain trauma from concussive blasts, and combat-relatedpost-traumatic stress," says David A. Jobes, Ph.D., a professor of psychology at the Catholic University of America. "This may be a uniquely dangerous moment for young American men and suicide, given the recent economic upheaval."

Doesn't seem too shocking, right? I mean, the article was pretty much right on. According to the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, men commit suicide almost four times as often as women do. While women attempt suicide more often, men succeed much more. Yet, when Feministing blogger "ekd" saw this, she didn't see an article addressing a legitimate concern. Oh no. According to her, MSNBC was suggesting that women don't suffer in tough times!
My first thought was, "So, women can't have economic concerns that are that important, now?"

I understand that this is coming entirely from a patriarchial perspective - that men have to support their families, and thus losing a job or having a family financial crisis is seen as a failure on their part. However, there are HOW many women today that support their own children and pay their own bills as single mothers or otherwise?

The subtitle of the article "War, debt and joblessness causing emotional distress for many young men"doesn't seem like something that should be primarly male - those are issues that are enough to make anyone depressed!

The article tries to make male suicide seem more pressing by stating that more men actually do go through with suicide than women, and calls women taking pills "halfhearted". This just reads like a continuation of the ever-present portrayal of male psychological problems (when addressed) as a "serious concern", while women are considered "silly".

Instead of worrying about how men are affected by job loss or economic issues, can we focus on how these affect the mental health of ALL affected?

Yes. She really got the point of that article. Mention how an economic recession may be causing an uptrend in male suicides, and it automatically means that you think that women don't suffer AT ALL. Apparently, the use of the word "halfheartedly" was enough to condemn the entire article.

I would have thought it was a good thing that, in stressful times, women are not committing suicide. Isn't that a positive? But I guess not. I'm assuming this must be the same line of logic where it's a good thing to have the same number of women dying in wars as there are men, which is another thing I completely don't understand. But I forgot -- we're dealing in feminism's warped sense of equality. An article brings up a very true and very worrying trend of male suicides in times of economic hardship, and because you don't devote exactly equal space to how economic hardship affects women, it automatically makes it SEXIST!!

She later "clarified" her position in the comments, saying:

My comment is that they link men's suicide being linked to the current economic situation. They're saying that because of the current situation, men are killing themselves. There's a lot more to it than that - women are just as affected as men, if not more.

I guess to make it "equal", MSNBC should promptly run an equally long article specifically detailing how many and how often women commit suicide because of economic hardships. Otherwise, MSNBC is -- wait for it -- just another tool for the PATRIARCHY.

For what it's worth, yes, men are affected much more by financial troubles. For most men, there is an innate pressure to be the provider for their family, and if they feel they are failing at that, it can affect them profoundly. The feminist response to this is, of course, to further demasculinize men, because how dare a man insinuate it's his responsibility to provide for his wife and children? She's just as capable as he is! The feminist response just goes to show exactly how woeful the feminist understanding of men is.

I'm just curious what it is that makes a feminist blogger see something like this and get offended. Do we need to just start ignoring all problems that may focus solely on men and only concentrate on women? Maybe we should figure out a way to give women prostate cancer now, too, so that we can make it really and truly equal.

Honestly, feminists grow more ridiculous by the day.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments (11)

You know, I could understan... (Below threshold)

You know, I could understand if she was crowing about how weak men are... a little heat in the kitchen and those silly men put their head in the oven.
But no. The victim mentality is so ingrained her reflex is to turn it around.

Wonder what she would say if someone pointed out that as usual, men just have a higher rate of success in yet another endeavor... (ducks and avoids slaps)

1. There is a real differe... (Below threshold)

1. There is a real difference between a half-hearted suicide attempt and a whole-hearted attempt to terminate one's existence. The former is a suicide GESTURE, a cry for help, and is much more common among women. It's just a fact. No reason to get sensitive about it.

2. Why can't any attention be directed toward men's health or psychiatric issues with some feminist getting his or her panties in a wad? Yes, women face special challenges and have unique health issues. So do men. In fact men die several years earlier women. And it's not because of suicides, wars and accidents. You don't have to be a part of the patriarchal oppression machine to point that out.

3. Women aren't ALWAYS the victim. Men can be victims of violence, disease, war, or anything else. Being a man can be really tough sometimes. It's strange that feminists have such a hard time with that. I suppose it's because it doesn't really fit in well with their chauvinist propoganda.


"propaganda"... (Below threshold)


When the stockmarket tanked... (Below threshold)

When the stockmarket tanked I thought about suicide, then I reconsidered and made my wife go to work. It's called the law of unintended consequences.

What's stupid is that the a... (Below threshold)

What's stupid is that the article really didn't say that men are now killing themselves at a higher rate, it said experts were worried that the rate might increase.

I think they should also be worried that the rate might increase in women also. The more that try, the more that succeed, regardless of gender.

Everything else (in your excerpts, at least) was true even in the "good times" of the Clinton years.

I'm not sure of the numbers here, but I doubt the "half-hearted" phrase myself. How many of the male suicides were half-hearted in that they may have changed their mind if they'd put it off a day or two? Damn that male competence.

Women may also perceive more options open to them in bad times than men. Going on welfare, going home to Momma and Daddy, etc., are not as much of an admission of failure to some women as they are to many men.

puleeeeze--If Femi... (Below threshold)


If Feminist feel so slighted by more MALE suicides, then by all means (Feminists) strive to make it EQUAL goofballs.

In the mean time, go put on something sexy and make me a sandwich.

That variety of feminism is... (Below threshold)

That variety of feminism is simply victimism founded on gender differences. A victimist must continue to feel victimized to keep her spirits up. (Yes, I really wrote that.) As soon as the misery spotlight swings to another focus, she feels deprived of her birthright.

Alternately, as legendary guitarist David Bromberg put it:

"You've got to suffer if you want to sing the blues."

Women kill themselves four ... (Below threshold)
Sister Y:

Women kill themselves four times as often as men - in the United States. But some groups - female American physicians, women in China and India - commit suicide almost as often as men - even more often, in the case of China and some other areas in Asia.

This is because women in these groups have access to lethal chemicals - female doctors can get lethal drugs to commit suicide effectively, and women in China have access to lethal poisons (e.g., pesticides) that women in the United States don't have access to.

Poisoning is a much more do-able method for women, compared to gunshot, which (largely) accounts for the discrepancy between male and female completed suicides in the United States. I bet it has less to do with differential suicidal intent (esp. given the China and physican data) than differing familiarity and comfort with, and ability to use, guns and other violent, effective methods.

There's a Japanese study that shows both male and female suicide rates responding to economic trouble.

I recall reading something ... (Below threshold)

I recall reading something about suicides by veterans (which, of course, drew all sorts of unsupported conclusions) but one statistic was the success rate of female military suicide, which was significantly higher than the success rate of civilian women who attempted suicide.

(IIRC the study of veteran's suicides was working with numbers as low as less than 20 individuals and the rate was still below the civilian population, at the time.)

This is interesting stuff.... (Below threshold)

This is interesting stuff. I wish y'all could have a debate and meet up face to face. I do wish we all read a little bit more and judged each other for our opinions a little bit less though. Maybe y'all oughta be a little bit more aware of the woman's response existing in context of a patriarchal society where the way articles like this are construed reflects patriarchal domination of thought and ideological productions. We all feel the effects of patriarchy but differently; I'd be pissed too, a little bit, because it's not really considered "news" when women slowly starve ourselves to death, except to say that women are for some reason influenced by "culture", not by violence against our bodies that we all have to find some way to deal with...yet men kill themselves and it's worth mentioning. Sometimes it's just interesting to note which bodies are considered important, what forms of violence are considered "newsworthy" whereas other forms of violence are simply seen as commonplace often seems like.

Its virtually impossible fo... (Below threshold)

Its virtually impossible for a feminist to acknowledge any inequities a man might face because their philosophy is based on victimization.






Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile


Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links


Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy