Warning: include_once(/home/kaylward/public_html/poll/poll_cookie.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/kaylward/public_html/content/2009/02/17/obama-eyes-swedish-model-for-us-banks-1.php on line 4

Warning: include_once(): Failed opening '/home/kaylward/public_html/poll/poll_cookie.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/kaylward/public_html/content/2009/02/17/obama-eyes-swedish-model-for-us-banks-1.php on line 4
Obama eyes Swedish model for US banks (Wizbang)

« President's Day Giveaway! | Main | If you drive a car, I'll tax the street. If you cop a squat, I'll tax your seat. If you get too cold, I'll tax the heat. »

Obama eyes Swedish model for US banks

First off, let me just say that I have nothing against Swedish models. In fact, I've eyed quite a few of them myself over the years.


But since we're talking about the Obama Administration, some reservations might be in order. The "Swedish model" involves the temporary nationalization of banks in order to clean up their books.

Almost twenty years ago, Sweden's economy plunged into a deep recession that was caused by the collapse of its banking system, which in turn was precipitated by the bursting of a lengthy real estate bubble that lasted through most of the 1980's. For several years, the Swedish government tried to prop up banks by loaning them money and guaranteeing against the loss of toxic assets. The economy refused to cooperate, and remained in a slump.

Then in 1992, the Swedish government announced a bold move: It was taking over the banks that had received the largest shares of government money. The government would manage their reorganization. Assets would be sold off in order to provide liquidity for borrowers. And once the banks were back in the black, the government would once again sell ownership of the banks to private investors.

The plan worked very well for Sweden. Its recession ended, its banks were financially sound, and through the proceeds collected from the sale of debts and bank shares, the Swedish government actually recouped a significant portion of the money that had been used to prop up the banks. Today Sweden's banks are majority-owned by private investors, though the government still owns portions of the nation's largest banks.

The Obama Administration seems to be considering a similar plan for American banks. There are good reasons for it, too. First (and most obvious) is that the Paulson/Bernanke bailout plan has fallen flat. And Timothy "Boy Wonder" Geithner's recent "Bailout II - Federal Boogaloo" plan has been met with similar derision.

The specter of Japan is also haunting monetary policymakers. During the 1990's, Japan tried to jump-start its economy with a seemingly endless series of stimulus plans, infrastructure projects, and treasury bond issues. All the Japanese got in return was the largest public debt in the developed world. Even though Japan is flush with cool miniature electronic gadgets, its economy is still in the doldrums.

And let's not forget that Obama himself was just rolled by the Reid-Pelosi Porkulus juggernaut that essentially forced him to break every campaign promise he made regarding the transparency and accountability that he was supposed to bring to the Federal government. The American people are not happy with this bill. Only a third of them think that it will do any good at all. And Obama's attempts at "bipartisanship" (think: 'I won') were laughable at best. He is hurting politically right now, and he needs a victory badly. A fresh plan to shore up our banking system might do that for him.

Curiously, prominent Republicans (specifically Lindsey Graham and John McCain) seem to also be interested in a temporary nationalization of banks. I would assume that they are more drawn toward the "temporary" part of the plan, whereas Democrats would be more attracted to the "nationalization" aspect.

Of course we all know that there is no such thing as "temporary" when the Federal government is involved. And bank nationalization would place an incredible amount of power into the hands of the government. Our current Congress obviously cannot be trusted to manage bank assets properly, and would you trust Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank, and Chris Dodd with voluntarily relinquishing Federal control of our banks once in had been established?

I'm not opposed to the idea of what would be essentially a government-managed bankruptcy for many of our bloated financial institutions, provided that we had some kind of a real guarantee that private ownership would eventually be restored. I also think that such a plan should be implemented at GM and Chrysler. But a real guarantee of a return to private ownership won't happen without Republican control of at least one house of Congress.

That's another reason to vote Republican in 2010.

  • Currently 4.6/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rating: 4.6/5 (11 votes cast)


Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):

AddThis Feed Button


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments (12)

WHY MUST THEY REINVENT THE ... (Below threshold)


This is what BANKRUPTCY COURT is for.

Because, Garand Fan, withou... (Below threshold)

Because, Garand Fan, without buying the votes to keep getting elected, congress critters can't keep their cushy jobs. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't those FN Hi-Powers? I didn't these realize these women were competitive shooters. I thought they just looked pretty.

Oh, and just where do I sig... (Below threshold)

Oh, and just where do I sign up for that Swedish Swat Team? I may be old, but I ain't dead. :o)

Why sure, let's give Barney... (Below threshold)

Why sure, let's give Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Reid and Pelosi et al COMPLETE control of our banking institutions.

What could POSSIBLY go wrong with that?

P.S.-----the li... (Below threshold)

P.S.-----the line starts right behind me, Garand Fan.

Tall. Blonde. Wearing bla... (Below threshold)

Tall. Blonde. Wearing black body suits. Carrying guns.

What's not to like?

Obama: step away from the b... (Below threshold)

Obama: step away from the banks!

I am simply unwilling to be... (Below threshold)

I am simply unwilling to believe the government can make anything better by taking it over. I mean, didn't they cause this in the first place?

After all, they've done so well with our social security.

Is that how they intend to run the banks? By putting all of the bank's assets in the general fund in exchange for paying tomorrow what they spend today?

When are we going to start ... (Below threshold)

When are we going to start caring that this country is becoming the exact opposite of what it was intended? Why are we so ready to relinquish more and more control over so much of our daily lives to a central authority?

I really do not understand this fascination with letting the government run everything. It seems like such a foreign idea to me. Which is probably why I feel like a foreigner in my own country these days...my fellow Americans are in love with the idea of Uncle Sam running everything.

OK looking handguns, but I'... (Below threshold)

OK looking handguns, but I'm not sure they are Swedish.

Let's talk about boring ban... (Below threshold)

Let's talk about boring banks and economics or hot, blondes in black body suits with cool guns. Let's talk about the girls!

Sorry...I may be conservative but I am not dead!

Ok...nationalizing is bad. The goverment running anything won't work.

Now, back to the blondes with guns...


But a real guarantee of ... (Below threshold)

But a real guarantee of a return to private ownership won't happen without Republican control of at least one house of Congress.

We can't afford the lunatics in the GOP.

Post a comment






Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile


Send e-mail tips to us:


Fresh Links


Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy