« Sales of Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged Triple | Main | Bad Math And Obama's Taxes »

I'm sorry.

Sometime a while back there was a fooferrah over hundreds of pouty-lip lackwits sending self portraits to a designed-just-for website posing with signs apologizing to...well, the rest of the socialist world, I guess...for the election of George W. Bush. After Obama was elected a new site sprang up with portraits of young hopesters/changesters exuberant over the new...well, less Bushalogically focused...America. Bush voters were encouraged to repent against their sin and embrace a hopier, changier future.

For sheer comic value (I'm assuming the site was a deliberate and surreptitious ruse by the VRWC to elicit self-parody from left wingers) it was top-shelf loaded. Yeah, we could all laugh during those halcyon days between the election and inauguration. After the so-called stimulus bill passed, I mentioned that all the spending so far is before a budget (for 2010) has been submitted. Bush's last budget was $2.9 trillion. Some commenters were kind enough to joke that Congress would pass a smaller budget in light of the stimulus.

Who really believes Congress will spend less than Bush in 2008? Or Obama circa 2009:

The proposed $3.55 trillion spending blueprint for the 2010 fiscal year that begins October 1 provides the broad outlines of a more detailed one to be released in April.
For liberal arts majors, that's a 16.4% increase over the spendthrift Bush administration in 2008. After adding $150B of off-budget spending for the Iraq war tab onto the budget. And after auto bailouts, bank bailouts, stimuli.
An eye-popping $1.75 trillion deficit for the 2009 fiscal year underlined the heavy blow the deep recession has dealt to the country's finances as Obama unveiled his first budget. That is the highest ever in dollar terms, and amounts to a 12.3 percent share of the economy -- the largest since 1945. In 2010, the deficit would dip to a still-huge $1.17 trillion, Obama predicted.

With that backdrop, his budget represents a gamble that Americans are ready for the sort of change they embraced by electing him in November -- a shift of wealth through higher taxes on the rich to pay for more government attention to healthcare, education, climate change and social programs.

That doesn't exactly sound like the bill of goods John Q. Public was being sold. I remember a more, "Crazy right-wingers are taking soundbites out of context to smear a moderate, centrist black man" zeitgeist. But when it comes to politics you see what you believe. I'm sorry. I though Change meant "Anybody but Bush".

By my back envelope calculations that $1.75 trillion number seems low. We're already upside down ~$1.5 trillion with the stimulus and bailout. Add another $450 billion to the Bush budget, figure tax receipts go way down during a recession and I see a $3 trillion deficit. Subject to increase pending any future "worst _________ since ___________."

Obama can sign or not sign the budget bill he gets from Congress. He will sign any bill no matter how grotesquely bloated.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat, praised Obama's spending priorities and chided Republicans for what she saw as their new found interest in limited government.

"Perhaps ... they (the Republicans) have amnesia," Pelosi said, noting that with Bush at the helm they turned budget surpluses into deficits, in part through significantly higher government spending.

Ug. Grog put hand in fire. Fire burn Grog. Now Grog put hand in fire longer and see what happen.

As I've said before, comparing Congress to the noble poo-flinging chimpanzee is an insult to apes.

I suggest Republicans play right into her hands. Submit an alternative budget of $2.75 trillion. With all the stimulus and bailout spending there's bound to be $150 billion worth of spending that can be trimmed from Bush's profligate $2.9 trillion budget of 2008. Bring the Iraq war on budget and it's a wash. Is that too unreasonable in light of the $2 trillion we've already committed off-budget this year? I'm sorry. We've spent enough of the taxpayers' money.

Bush is gone and the Republican Party had best refind their interest in limited government. God help us all if a few brave Democrats don't join with them. Forecasting a smaller future deficit based on more spending, higher marginal tax rates, and energy taxation is folly of the highest order.

It was that kind of thinking that made the Depression great. Change meant exchanging the "failed policies of the last eight years" for the failed economic policies of the 1930's and the failed energy policies of the 1970's? How many leaches does it take to cure the patient?

I'm sorry.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments (9)

Wait a minute. When Obama ... (Below threshold)

Wait a minute. When Obama told Joe the Plumber he wanted to "spread the wealth" he really meant it? But, but, I thought we were taking him out of context. Now it appears that was what he really did want to do, and we knew, despite the media telling us otherwise, but we voted for him because we really wanted it and knew the media was lying. And even though we embraced what he said, but didn't really but really did, it's now a gamble because maybe we really didn't want what we thought he wanted but was told he didn't but knew he really did. That about right?

Don't worry, it's gonna get... (Below threshold)

Don't worry, it's gonna get worse.

1) Obama doesn't give a rats ass about the economy. Look at who he's appointing and where. He has a social agenda to fulfill. The economy is just to distract people and get them hooked on the government teat.

2) Nancy has an unlimited credit card. She's happy spending. And will continue to do so.

3) Reid has always been in over his head, and will do what he's told.

Obama = Hope & Change.... (Below threshold)

Obama = Hope & Change.

Obama = Largest U.S. budget in history.

Obama = Bush III.

ObamaBots = Fools to the very core of their being.

"Perhaps ... they (the R... (Below threshold)

"Perhaps ... they (the Republicans) have amnesia,"

And this is a reasoned response? After all their complaining of Republican spending, the answer is to spend more? What kind of topsy-turvy world are we in now?

Economy NoticeDue ... (Below threshold)

Economy Notice

Due to recent budget cuts and the cost of electricity, gas and oil, as well as current market conditions and the continued decline of the U.S. economy:

The Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off.

We apologize for the inconvenience

"Perhaps ... they (the Repu... (Below threshold)

"Perhaps ... they (the Republicans) have amnesia," Pelosi said, noting that with Bush at the helm they turned budget surpluses into deficits"

And the Democrats are turning those deficits into incredibly MASSIVE deficits. How in the hell is THAT going to be better?

You know what's bizzare to me? It seems the more that the Democrats spend, the worse the economy gets. You'd almost get the feeling there's an inverse relationship, wouldn't you?

But they don't have much of a choice. They STOP spending, they'll lose their support. The shark can't stop swimming - even if it has no more food.

They've really figured out ... (Below threshold)

They've really figured out how to cut the deficit in half next year.

They're going to spend all of the money this year, so they'll only have to cover the minimum expenses next year.

"Look! We only had a $2 trillion budget in 2010!"

"That's because you spent $5 trillion in 2009."

Submit an alternative bu... (Below threshold)

Submit an alternative budget of $2.75 trillion.

Can they do that? We know that the budget has to originate in the House. And my understanding is that in the House the majority party pretty much just allows the submittal of what they want. Republicans weren't allowed to even submit their alternative plans for the "stimulus" were they? In the Senate they were allowed to submit amendments to be shot down, etc., but not in the House. Yeah, they can come up with an alternative and put it on a website and such - but in reality I don't think they can actually put it in for a vote. And, with the able assistance of the fifth column in the fourth estate, the public really won't ever even hear about it. As a result we get things like the editorial that appeared in my paper this week that claimed the Republicans never proposed an alternative to the "stimulus"...which is completely bogus, yet may be 'technically' true.

(and, yes, I understand the point you're making, I'm sort of making a tangential one about them not being to do anything as long as Pelosi says no. the GOP did the same thing when they held the House)

A rather hilarious, and acc... (Below threshold)

A rather hilarious, and accurate, portrayal of how congress is helping us get out of this mess http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYckLTQGVRA&eurl=http://beema.wordpress.com/2009/03/03/beemanews_3mar09/ (Just trying to lighten the mood a little!)






Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile


Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links


Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy