« "You have my disgust and disdain forever, you socialist-coddling coward." | Main | Connecticut reaps the benefit of ObamaCare passage »

100 Reasons Why Climate Change is Natural

The UK's Daily Express just published "Climate Change Is Natural: 100 Reasons Why." Here's a sampling:

70) Richard Lindzen, Professor of Atmospheric Sciences at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, wrote: "The notion of a static, unchanging climate is foreign to the history of the Earth or any other planet with a fluid envelope. Such hysteria (over global warming) simply represents the scientific illiteracy of much of the public, the susceptibility of the public to the substitution of repetition for truth."
86) There are no experimentally verified processes explaining how CO2 concentrations can fall in a few centuries without falling temperatures - in fact it is changing temperatures which cause changes in CO2 concentrations, which is consistent with experiments that show CO2 is the atmospheric gas most readily absorbed by water.
98) The Leipzig Declaration in 1996, was signed by 110 scientists who said: "We - along with many of our fellow citizens - are apprehensive about the climate treaty conference scheduled for Kyoto, Japan, in December 1997" and "based on all the evidence available to us, we cannot subscribe to the politically inspired world view that envisages climate catastrophes and calls for hasty actions."

And Tim Blair has a bit of fun with The New York Times, sifting through over 100 years of Times headlines and finding dozens of reports of our impending doom:

• 1881: "This past Winter, both inside and outside the Arctic circle, appears to have been unusually mild. The ice is very light and rapidly melting ..."

• 1932: "NEXT GREAT DELUGE FORECAST BY SCIENCE; Melting Polar Ice Caps to Raise the Level of Seas and Flood the Continents"

• 1934: "New Evidence Supports Geology's View That the Arctic Is Growing Warmer"

• 1937: "Continued warm weather at the Pole, melting snow and ice."

• 1954: "The particular point of inquiry concerns whether the ice is melting at such a rate as to imperil low-lying coastal areas through raising the level of the sea in the near future."

• 1957: "U.S. Arctic Station Melting"

• 1958: "At present, the Arctic ice pack is melting away fast. Some estimates say that it is 40 per cent thinner and 12 per cent smaller than it was fifteen years [ago]."

• 1959: "Will the Arctic Ocean soon be free of ice?"

The chaotic Copenhagen climate change conference came to an end this weekend, just as a massive snowstorm effectively shut Copenhagen down. Of course weather patterns are not sole indicators of climate, but one can't help but notice the number of wintertime global warming-related events during the past few years that have been impeded by the coincident arrival of unseasonably cold weather.

Right now I am hopeful that the coming year will bring about two important realizations about "climate change." First, our climate, like the rest of our natural environment, is in a constant state of change. That universal truth is the heart of evolution, which essentially means "change." I have never understood how those on the cultural left, who cling to the precepts of Darwinian evolution like some kind of holy scripture, could at the same time insist that our climate must be static, and "climate change" is somehow proof of "unnatural" interference by mankind.

Second, the disgraceful show put on by Hugo Chavez and his socialist pals, as he openly called for the crippling of Western economies and the direct transfer of wealth from northern to southern hemisphere nations, punctuated by thunderous roars of applause from the Copenhagen conference attendees, perfectly illustrates the real agenda behind the worldwide movement to address "climate change." Most people would welcome legitimate programs to guarantee individual liberty and economic growth in developing nations, but few would support a plan that increased the relative economic power of Third World nations by crippling the First World economy.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments (8)

Follow the money.... (Below threshold)

Follow the money.

From a previous comment: ".... (Below threshold)

From a previous comment: "... those on the cultural left, who cling to the precepts of Darwinian evolution like some kind of holy scripture ..."

Is that what you call the entire scientific community, the cultural left? You're obviously another uneducated moron who is terrified of modern biology because it threatens your childish belief in a magic god fairy.

Number 1 reason why glob... (Below threshold)
Tina S:

Number 1 reason why global warming can not be real.

It would turn your worlds upside down to have admit that Al Gore and environmentalists were right. It would be too much to stomach.

The number one reason to be... (Below threshold)
Mac Lorry:

The number one reason to believe climate change is natural is because it has been explained and that explanation corresponds with global temperature to an amazing degree.

The link between CO2 and climate is the result of a flawed fundamental assumption. Hundreds of brilliant climatologists have worked long and hard to build an impressive fortress called "consensus", but if they look they'll see it's built on sand.

Copenhagen, like Kyoto and ... (Below threshold)
Jim Addison:

Copenhagen, like Kyoto and "cap 'n' tax" are no more about climate than Obamacare is about health.

Both are concerned with taking economic power from the people and giving it to government, stopping the marketplace and replacing it with unelected bureaucrats to decide the "proper outcomes." Oh, and the money, of course.

Anyone who ever believed otherwise of either initiative was ignorant, stupid, dishonest, or some combination thereof.

Michael Laprarie,Y... (Below threshold)
Tina S:

Michael Laprarie,

You are allowing yourself to be manipulated by the oil industy.

You know how during the 1950's the tobacco industry hired a handful of doctors to make the ridiculous claim that smoking is not harmful?

Well Richard Lindzen is still telling people that the link between smoking and cancer is weak. This is no joke, Richard Lindzen is bought and paid for by special interests.


The Leipzig Declaration in 1996 is a fraud that was exposed a long time ago. Many of the peope who supposedly signed it denied doing so and said they never would have, because every study they have done supports the theory of global warming.

I not so sure that the melt... (Below threshold)

I not so sure that the melting of the ice caps would be such a bad thing. If it raises the sea level it would flood the east coast and west coast of this country and we would probably be better off without them.

I have never understood how this would raise the sea level. If I let the ice melt in a glass of water, it doesn't overflow the glass.

And while this whole bunch ... (Below threshold)

And while this whole bunch of UN wacks were gathering in COPENHEGAN the HOT AIR was pourin outta that building where they were meeting






Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile


Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links


Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy