« Washington Post begins to dismantle "Tea Party is racism" meme | Main | The New Yorker Reveals Democrat's Secret Plan For 2010 Midterms »

"They are the same"

They being terrorists and confederate soldiers of long ago.

No.  I'm not kidding:

Defenders of the Confederacy say that innocent people were killed in the Civil War; hasn't the same argument been presented by Muslim radicals in Iraq, Afghanistan and other places where the U.S. has tangled with terrorists?

We can't on the one hand justify the actions of Confederates as being their duty as valiant men of the South, and then condemn the Muslim extremists who want to see Americans die a brutal death. These men are held up as honorable by their brethren, so why do Americans see them as different from our homegrown terrorists?

The fundamental problem with extremism is that when you're on the side that is fanatical, all of your actions make sense to you, and you are fluent in trying to justify every action. Every position of those you oppose is a personal affront that calls for you to do what you think is necessary to protect yourself and your family.

Just as radical Muslims have a warped sense of religion, Confederate supporters have a delusional view of what is honorable. The terrorists are willing to kill their own to prove their point, and the Confederates were just as willing in the Civil War to take up arms against their fellow Americans to justify their point.

Even if you're a relative of one of the 9/11 hijackers, that man was an out-and-out terrorist, and nothing you can say will change that. And if your great-great-great-granddaddy was a Confederate who stood up for Southern ideals, he too was a terrorist.

They are the same.

As a matter of conscience, I will not justify, understand or accept the atrocious view of Muslim terrorists that their actions represent a just war. They are reprehensible, and their actions a sin against humanity.

And I will never, under any circumstances, cast Confederates as heroic figures who should be honored and revered. No -- they were, and forever will be, domestic terrorists.

Liberalism survives by redefining terms.  This piece is no exception.

Something that isn't racist is defined as racism.

Something that is anti-semitic is defined as merely opposition to Israeli policies.

And something like The South of long ago is now defined to be filled with terrorist states.

We are at war ideologically.

It's time to choose sides.

H/T Confederate Yankee who takes Roland Martin's missive to the next logical level:

Implied Roland Martin's bizarre comparison is a direct parallel between Fort Sumter and the 9/11 terror attacks.

Crossposted at Brutally Honest.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "They are the same":

» Brutally Honest linked with "They are the same"

Comments (10)

Somebody who doesn't unders... (Below threshold)

Somebody who doesn't understand what racism is or means also doesn't understand what terrorist means.

This is not news.

Just the ranting of another warped mind.

That guy make me seriously ... (Below threshold)

That guy make me seriously ill.

Martin's head is so far up ... (Below threshold)

Martin's head is so far up his fat liberal ass, he has difficulty breathing.

I was sentenced to watch CN... (Below threshold)

I was sentenced to watch CNN while on vacation in Mexico several months back. I'd never heard of or seen this guy before then and was struck how much he whined and focused on race. It was pathetic.

Does that mean that nuking ... (Below threshold)
Sheik Yur Bouty:

Does that mean that nuking Mecca would be like Sherman burning Atlanta to the ground?

What really would ha... (Below threshold)
Tsar Nicholas II:

What really would have been rich is if the liberal Moonbat who authored that article had concluded with a missive that all Southerners should therefore be waterboarded.

That so many black people e... (Below threshold)
Jim Addison:

That so many black people either believe this sort of crap or are willing to tolerate it and vote as if they believe it is quite dispiriting.

Martin's head i... (Below threshold)
Martin's head is so far up his fat liberal ass, he has difficulty breathing.
No difficulty. The gases he takes in that way are perfect for nourishing proggnut "thought" processes.
gee, Shermans march to the ... (Below threshold)

gee, Shermans march to the sea was a textbook example of a terror campaign against civilians ...

wait, he was a Union General ... opps, I forgot the talking point ...

Roland Martin? Wasn't that... (Below threshold)

Roland Martin? Wasn't that the guy that created "Laugh-In?" Funny - he just sounds like a typical lib douchebag...






Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile


Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links


Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy