« Washington Examiner: Goldman Sachs could be worse than Enron for Obama | Main | Humans And Animals. Hard To Tell One From The Other Sometimes »

Reason and Politics

I have been reading a very badly-done book written by a very lazy author. The book is titled "The Successor", and the author is Stephen Frey. I found the book at the library when trying to find new books for my daughter and myself, and seeing that the library had several books by the author, I decided to give him a try, because if he was good there would be a lot of material to enjoy. However, Stephen Frey is to good writing what Al Gore is to personal integrity - he claims the honor but does nothing to deserve it. The characters are shallow and predictable, stereotypes abound, and while the plot moves along, the reader is neither enriched ethically nor challenged intellectually in reading this sludge. If Big Macs can be said to be bad for your physique, then this author is a threat to brain cells and rational analysis.

Leaving aside the horrid fiction of Mr. Frey though, I pondered the way this man thinks. He happens to be not only a liberal but also a managing director of a private equity firm in Florida. In this regard, Frey seems to be of the common liberal aristocratic mold - like the Kennedys, he expects the common people to be unable to govern themselves, and therefore the election of a liberal is by the grace of some unnamed ethical force - perhaps the Shiny Pony Unicorn, since Frey's characters never mention God except when swearing - while the election of a conservative is (in his mind) a swindling of the sheep by the appointment of a crook by his cronies. As if that tired old libel were not enough, Frey is clearly unable to recognize an accurate image of the professional American soldier, the notion that ordinary working-class Americans have worthwhile values and noble ideals they live by, or even to respect the notion that people who earn their money are perhaps better judges of what should be done with their taxes than men who have never worked for a living, like Congressmen, Equity firm directors and novelists who spew out a book with less than a third of the effort needed to develop the characters, plot, and theme.

I could go on disparaging Mr. Frey for a long time without insulting him half so badly as he deserves, but the man would probably enjoy the attention, fail to understand the issue, and in any case the larger question take precedence. That question for here, is how to make sure that we, as conservatives, do not commit the same offenses as Mr. Frey. That is, it is tempting to caricature liberals according to the worst behavior of their leading slimeballs, but in all honesty, they can't all be as corrupt as Harry Reid, as stupid as Nancy Pelosi, or as brazenly self-serving as President Obama. Some liberals are honest, sincere in their desire to help as many people, to address suffering and seek justice. Sure, they're going about it the wrong way, in much the same way that a lot of good, honest Germans somehow failed to see Adolf Hitler and the Nazis for what they were (kneejerk spittle attacks from the Leftists reading this in 3, 2 ...), but they do mean well. What else is odd, is that many of them are reasonably smart, like Mr. Frey. Foolish and astoundingly short-sighted, though, as if they only use their intelligence every so often, like some people I knew in school. In a way, that's a kind of hint from Life. People get romantically involved with individuals they know will be bad for them, throw away opportunity and every good thing for some stupid thrill of the moment, and yeah, they vote for people that - down deep - they know will turn out to be frauds and liars. And sorry folks, there's no shortage of that kind of foolishness on either side of the aisle. Sure, the Republicans found Reagan, or more likely God took pity on America and sent him - then got angry at us and punished us with Obama - but the GOP also gave us Bob Dole and John McCain. And sorry, I know this will get me some flak from our side, but no, Sarah Palin is not Presidential timber. She's a fine person and stands for some great values, but ... no. The thing is, millions of Republicans supported candidates they knew would lose, and in any case were not what the country needed. That does not make it rational for someone to vote for Senator Chicago-Way, but we need to understand that politics is not often about what is right and reasonable.

Of course, most drunks sober up, most kids eventually grow up, and once you think seriously about the future you can't have a conscience and a three-digit IQ and not be a conservative. But the real world has alcoholics, career criminals, and Democrats, and even an Equity Fund director is not immune to the complete collapse of his moral framework. So, the next time some troll plasters the blog with some screed that even Hillary Clinton would consider going too far, just remember that for some folks, that's the only universe they know.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments (5)

Obama sucks..Sorry... (Below threshold)

Obama sucks..

Sorry alternate universers.

A big part of the problem i... (Below threshold)
Jim Addison:

A big part of the problem is that we have abandoned some of our key institutions - the government bureaucracy and the academy in particular - to partisan leftists who have constructed this alternate reality in which their articles of faith may not be challenged.

You have people completely insulated from reality and the economic consequences of their decision running both these areas and entrenching their statist religious beliefs. It is going to take a long time to wake up the public and reform the institutions, if it even remains possible.

Oh, you have barely scratch... (Below threshold)

Oh, you have barely scratched the surface of the leftist sickness that infects pop culture. I hang out at Big Hollywood and I've felt so relieved to read about other conservatives reactions to the "liberal tell" and the "sucker punch."

The "liberal tell" is when you meet a conservative Christian in a novel or a movie or television show, and you know immediately that this person is the villain and will be (gasp!) revealed at the exciting (utterly boring and predictable) end of the story.

The "sucker punch" is when you're enjoying a movie or book and a leftist insult comes out of nowhere. Like the swipe at Ann Coulter on "Glee", or the swipe at Republicans in "Julie and Julia", a movie I was enjoying greatly before I was sucker punched.

And novels? Don't get me started. One of my favorite novelists, Lee Child, had his ex-Army main character, Jack Reacher, express hatred for the military and admire deserters in his novel "Nothing to Lose." The hurt and outrage over this beloved character's betrayal of everything he stood for was shrugged off by the author. He wanted Obama elected so he wrote a book to help him out, and didn't care about the character he'd created.

I just finished the latest in a pretty good series, Repairman Jack. But suddenly at the end of "All the Rage" the hero leaves the monster alive in the woods and smirks as some hunters come in to do deer hunting. He's okay with letting men get torn apart by a monster because, hey, they're hunters. And the author sees nothing wrong with this because everyone hates hunters, right?

I never pick up a book any more without a solid recommendation by someone who's read it. I hate getting sucker punched.

so many Americans today hav... (Below threshold)

so many Americans today have an world view that is artificially contructed from various theories which have been wholly discreditied in the real world.
Socialism, unlimited welfare, green power, green jobs ... it is theories like these that make up their world view and they simply cannot subject them to rational empirical evaluation. If your entire world view is built on a foundation of half truths or outright lies ... guess what, you know it in your heart ... but there is no way you can fix your world view without endangering your sanity ...

Some conservati... (Below threshold)
Some conservatives are honest, sincere in their desire to help as many people, to address suffering and seek justice. Sure, they're going about it the wrong way, in much the same way that a lot of good, honest Germans somehow failed to see Adolf Hitler and the Nazis for what they were

Fixed your post for you.

What, is it somehow no fair when I say it? Interesting.






Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile


Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links


Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy