« Froma Harrop - Uninformed Dumbass of the Day | Main | Super smart lawyers not so smart after all »

Dark Side of the "force"

From Rahm Emanuel's interview with Jake Tapper, aired Sunday on ABC's This Week:

TAPPER: Are you satisfied with what BP has done so far in terms of capping the well?

EMANUEL: Well, as you know, there is a test here. OK? BP originally was going to do one relief well. We forced them to do a second relief well. They weren't going to do that. BP originally had a plan on capturing a certain amount of oil. We forced that, as you know, today's reports, they're up to 25,000. By the end of June, we forced them by making them do different things to get up to 50,000 barrels a day.

And by mid-July we think we'll be -- and be able to get them to a point capturing 90 percent of that.

TAPPER: And those relief well...

EMANUEL: And originally...

TAPPER: ... by August, do you think they're going to be working?

EMANUEL: And by -- wait a second, and also, Jake, is they originally weren't thinking about $20 billion. And they originally weren't thinking about an escrow account and forcing them to do that. There are certain things that they had to be pushed -- not certain things, like a lot of things that they had to be pushed to do. And pushed to do faster, more of.

And so when you asked me, do we think the wells will work? Their original plan was only one. We forced them to take a step and have a redundancy in the system, which is what you're also seeing in the capturing of the oil that's spewing right now.

They had a system in place, not extensive enough. Not fast enough. So we've made them go from 25,000 to 50,000 barrels by the end of this month. And we think by mid-July force -- basically making them pick up their game. They can get to 90 percent.

Can anyone explain what's really going on here? My better judgment says that it's pretty unlikely that the White House actually "forced" BP to do any of these things. All of them were well within BP's means, and BP's apparent capitulation is probably the result of a very well-played round of negotiations between BP (which pretty well knew what it would be told to do, and simply waited for the orders to come from the White House) and the Obama Administration, which assumed that it had "won" but probably got played, big time.

On the other hand, it scares the hell out of me when a top Administration official brags about "forcing" a private company to conduct its business in a certain manner. It doesn't matter whether the government's actions were presumed to be "just" or not, we live in a nation where the government is expected to follow due process of law. The Executive branch should not be allowed to interfere with the operation of private businesses through the use of strong-arm tactics. Period.

Related -- from Sarah Field at The Daily Caller:

BP is, in all likelihood, chiefly responsible for this disaster. At the same time, the Obama administration's habit of dragging CEOs before Congress can certainly be seen as pattern of highly calculated government shakedowns.

Just ask Mr. Toyoda. Or the CEO of Humana, who was investigated by the administration, because his company warned customers about the pitfalls of ObamaCare. Or the former CEO of GM who has forced to resign by the administration. A pattern is clearly emerging.

... Our judicial system exists for many reasons, but one of the most obvious is that an independent judiciary is in the best position to consider the facts of a case, look at the evidence, then determine the legitimacy of legal claims. This is, after all, what they do all day.

On the other hand, an Obama administration-run victim compensation fund would be stacked with inexperienced, unaccountable government bureaucrats who are learning the process as they go along. They're supposed to make fine distinctions between "direct" and "indirect" claims, yet they don't have the expertise to do so. We don't do armchair quarterbacking, so why should Congress encourage the Obama administration's armchair lawyering?

Thomas Sowell is also on the same page:

Many among the public and in the media may think that the issue is simply whether BP's oil spill has damaged many people, who ought to be compensated. But our government is supposed to be "a government of laws and not of men." If our laws and our institutions determine that BP ought to pay $20 billion-- or $50 billion or $100 billion-- then so be it.

But the Constitution says that private property is not to be confiscated by the government without "due process of law." Technically, it has not been confiscated by Barack Obama, but that is a distinction without a difference.

With vastly expanded powers of government available at the discretion of politicians and bureaucrats, private individuals and organizations can be forced into accepting the imposition of powers that were never granted to the government by the Constitution.

If you believe that the end justifies the means, then you don't believe in Constitutional government. And, without Constitutional government, freedom cannot endure. There will always be a "crisis"-- which, as the president's chief of staff has said, cannot be allowed to "go to waste" as an opportunity to expand the government's power.

Indeed there is a pattern emerging, and history tells us that unless it is stopped, the outcome will be far different -- and far worse -- than anyone ever expected.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments (12)

Did you really expect somet... (Below threshold)
Caesar Augustus:

Did you really expect something different from a collection of Marxist thugs??

History?Learn from... (Below threshold)


Learn from?

Piffle! Who ever LEARNED anything about what some old farts did years ago?

Rahm sounds like he was rec... (Below threshold)

Rahm sounds like he was reciting memorized 'talking points'. He's got to by lying, his lips are moving. And just how does the White House "force" a business to do something that said WH has absolutely no expertise in? Why can't the WH insist on 95% recovery of all oil by June 23rd? Immanuel is full of bull shit.

Roehm, er I mean Rahm is ju... (Below threshold)
jim m:

Roehm, er I mean Rahm is just being a good little socialist and placing the blame where it belongs on those evil businesses. AS he so eloquently explains the purpose of government is to force the private individual into coughing up his/her money for the state.

The point is that it doesn'... (Below threshold)
Jim Addison:

The point is that it doesn't matter that it might be a good idea if BP established such a fund or invited independent supervision of it. If the President can go outside the law to force (er, I mean, "convince") BP to do his will, and fire the CEO of GM, and use federal funds to take over private companies to screw the bondholders and stockholders in favor of the unions, even if you think all that was just peachy keen cool, he can also go beyond the law to do things you might find less appealing to your personal list of preferences.

We are either a nation ruled by law, or by decree. It is one, or it is the other, but it cannot be both - because if it pretends to be both, it is really rule by decree, since that will always be employed when the law doesn't suit the decreer.

Sounds like Rahm is letting... (Below threshold)

Sounds like Rahm is letting his Napoleonic Complex show again.

#4. I don't think Rahm is a... (Below threshold)

#4. I don't think Rahm is a socialist. He's a lover of power (and thug power is just a means to that end) and manipulation. That just means he has a home with the modern left, who are rarely concerned with the means of advancing their agendas.

Speaking of thugs: That $20... (Below threshold)
John S:

Speaking of thugs: That $20 billion the government extorted from BP? The IRS will seize at least a third of it in income taxes when it's paid out.

Rahm...Rahm...Rahm...you g... (Below threshold)

Rahm...Rahm...Rahm...you guy's didn't "force" BP to do ANYTHING! BP made this mess and is doing everything they can to collect ever drop of oil possible. wanna know what's really happin'
lot's of Lee Ward (the sky is falling) types and many very experienced petroleum engineer types here:


"forced" my a$$,

Speaking of Lee - did he ge... (Below threshold)

Speaking of Lee - did he get bounced, or is he just waiting for new talking points?

While Rahm burns Barry digs... (Below threshold)

While Rahm burns Barry digs divots and plans his next takeover. Grey poop-on anyone?

"I'd love to see you try... (Below threshold)

"I'd love to see you try to explain exactly what the president did that was illegal, Jim. But we all know you won't, because you can't."

Let me help a little. Dereliction of duty is an impeachable offense and is a criminal act against the citizens of the Golf region as well as the rest of us. Hussein did not act to protect our borders from oil no, he still does nothing accept extract his pound of flesh from BP inbetween rounds of gulf.

He is burnt toast and he knows it. He is a self destructive America hater that is gonna have his ass whipped in November if not sooner.






Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile


Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links


Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy