« This should grab you... should shake you... should wake you | Main | Nice Day for A White Wedding »

You've heard Democrats demand social justice. Now they want political justice: votes for felons, not for the military

ObamaCare and Fannie and Freddie are tools the Democrats are using to enact social justice through the redistribution of wealth. They seize money from the rich and hand it over to the poor through health care coverage and home mortgages.

It appears that the Democrats are now trying to enact political justice by what amounts to the redistribution of votes. You maybe asking how one redistributes votes. By disenfranchising legal voters and enfranchising illegal voters. And this is exactly what Eric Holder's Justice Department is doing. From The Washington Times' July 28th editorial:

John Cornyn co-authored a 2009 law mandating that states mail absentee ballots to military voters at least 45 days before the election. Yet, as former Justice Department lawyer Eric Eversole first reported in The Washington Times last week, the department seems to be encouraging states to apply for waivers so they won't have to follow that law. More than 17,000 Americans serving overseas were denied the vote in 2008 - but, presumably because military personnel are thought to lean conservative, the liberal Obama administration is in no hurry to correct the situation.

The Justice Department is so unenthusiastic about military voting that its website still lists the old requirement for a shorter 30-day military voting window, rather than the current law mandating 45 days. On the other hand, the Justice Department has no legislative mandate whatsoever to involve itself with helping felons to vote, but its website devotes a large section - 2,314 words - to advising felons how to regain voting privileges.

As confirmed by The Washington Times last week, Justice Department official Rebecca Wertz told a Feb. 1 conference of the National Association of Secretaries of State that the new law's requirements are somehow open to interpretation. On July 28, an attendee at that conference - heretofore uninterviewed - told The Washington Times that Ms. Wertz's message was "totally undermining" the law. The earlier reports actually underplayed the effect of Ms. Wertz's comments. "It was even more pronounced at the meeting," said the source. "She undermined [the law] right in front of everybody. When I heard what she was saying, I thought: 'You've got to be kidding!' ... It was a clear reversal of roles for Justice to no longer be enforcing the law."

Eric Holder's DOJ is deliberately misinterpreting the law regarding military votes for the purpose of making it as difficult as possible for our military men and women to vote. At the same time it is working overtime to help felons get their voting rights back.

Quin Hillyer at The American Spectator is equally outraged:

What the editorial doesn't describe is the content of those 2,314 words. It's amazing. The time and effort required to compile all the information, and the obvious priority the Obamites made it, really show the highly politicized cast of mind of this administration. The section includes a state-by-state list of where felons can call or write in order to try to get their voting privileges back. Yet, I repeat, this should be NO business of the Justice Department. It has no statutory or constitutional role to play in helping felons regain voting privileges. But it DOES have a statutory requirement to help DoD ensure voting rights for the military, yet it can't even be bothered, with an entire year to do it, to post even a simple link to the new law requiring that ballots be mailed to military personnel 45 days before an election.

The fact of the matter is felons vote for Democrats. John Fund noted this trend in a July 14th WSJ article about Al Franken's felonious votes (emphasis mine):

Academic work by Jeff Manza and Marcus Britton of Northwestern University and Christopher Uggen of the University of Minnesota has shown that a large majority of felons routinely vote Democratic. The two academics estimated that Bill Clinton pulled 86% of the felon vote in 1992 and 93% in 1996. Statistician John Lott's own work in Washington State found that felons were 37% more likely to be registered Democrats even when accounting for race, gender, education level, religious habits, employment, age, and county of residence.

In the Democrat mind, felons are actually victims of the rich, having been created by poverty and not by their own actions, while members of the military are imperialist war mongers who get joy out of oppressing and terrorizing innocent people in other nations. To deny the members of the US military their right to vote while granting it to felons is, to Democrats, political justice. It's the redistribution of votes much like the redistribution of wealth. And it's all done for the purpose of electing Democrats in perpetuity.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments (7)

For those who thought there... (Below threshold)
Jim Addison:

For those who thought there is no honor among thieves, this news that felons support their own kind will come as a great shock.

Could we ever get as crooke... (Below threshold)

Could we ever get as crooked a bunch of politicians as the Wun's administration evah again? I know it's a rhetorical question but..

Yes. If the Won win's again.

Hmmmmmmm.....almost like 'b... (Below threshold)

Hmmmmmmm.....almost like 'birds of a feather'.

Speaking of 'birds of a fea... (Below threshold)

Speaking of 'birds of a feather'; look who's throwing a birthday bash for Charlie Rangel:

"Democratic leaders and major party donors plan to hold a lavish 80th birthday gala for Charles Rangel at The Plaza Hotel in Manhattan next month, despite 13 ethics charges pending against the veteran lawmaker.

Lobbyists and other party donors received invitations this week to join Sens. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) and New York Gov. David Paterson at one of New York's finest hotels to celebrate Rangel's birthday.

Gubernatorial candidate Andrew Cuomo and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg are also listed as featured guests, according to an invitation viewed by The Hill."

So will Mitchie the Kid McC... (Below threshold)

So will Mitchie the Kid McConnell, John Boehner and other republican higher-ups SCREAM about this on the national news programs this weekend?? Will they launch an unmerciful attack on the left, exposing this disgraceful agenda to the voting public??? OF COURSE NOT!!! After all, such non-bipartisan behavior might UPSET the undecideds and moderates. And we certainly can't have THAT, can we!!!

Felons ARE democrats or dem... (Below threshold)

Felons ARE democrats or democrats ARE felons. Either way. ww

Eric Holder's DOJ has turne... (Below threshold)

Eric Holder's DOJ has turned into George Orwell's 'Ministry of Truth' where right is wrong and everything they do benefits those in power.






Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile


Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links


Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy