« No hope for change with the TSA | Main | "the occult is not innocent entertainment" »

Indian 'microfinance' system on the brink of disaster

The microfinance industry, which up to now has been one of the great triumphs out of the many anti-poverty and social justice campaigns created to help third world nations, is suddenly facing what appears to be imminent collapse in India.

Do any of these circumstances sound familiar?

Initially the work of non-profit groups, the tiny loans to the poor known as micro-credit once seemed a promising path out of poverty for millions. In recent years, foundations, venture capitalists and the World Bank have used India as a petri dish for similar for-profit "social enterprises" that seek to make money while filling a social need. Like-minded industries have sprung up in Africa, Latin America and other parts of Asia.

But micro-finance in pursuit of profits has led some micro-credit companies around the world to extend loans to poor villagers at exorbitant interest rates and without enough regard for their ability to repay. Some companies have more than doubled their revenues annually.

... Responding to public anger over abuses in the micro-credit industry -- and growing reports of suicides among people unable to pay mounting debts -- legislators in the state of Andhra Pradesh last month passed a stringent new law restricting how the companies can lend and collect money.

Even as the new legislation was being passed, local leaders urged people to renege on their loans, and repayments on nearly $2 billion in loans in the state have virtually ceased. Lenders say that less than 10 percent of borrowers have made payments in the past couple of weeks.

If the trend continues, the industry faces collapse in a state where more than a third of its borrowers live. Lenders are also having trouble making new loans in other states, because banks have slowed lending to them as fears about defaults have grown.

Government officials in the state say they had little choice but to act, and point to women like Durgamma Dappu, a widowed laborer from this impoverished village who took a loan from a private micro-finance company because she wanted to build a house.

She had never had a bank account or earned a regular salary but was given a $200 loan anyway, which she struggled to repay. So she took another from a different company, then another, until she was nearly $2,000 in debt. In September she fled her village, leaving her family little choice but to forfeit her tiny plot of land, and her dreams.

Loans made to people with little experience managing money and no apparent means of paying them back? Check. Banks creating risky schemes to make money off of those loans, with no apparent consideration for risk? Check. Agitators encouraging borrowers to ignore banking rules or default on loans as a form of social protest? Check. Sounds a whole lot like our own subprime mortgage collapse.

The original idea behind micro credit was simple: loan small amounts of money to impoverished people in order for them to make capital investments -- a bicycle, farm animals, a telephone, etc. The borrowers would use these capital items to generate an income, from which they would be able to earn a better living and pay back the loan.

If additional loans were needed at a later time and the borrower had a good credit history, they would be available. And if the borrower needed larger sums of money, the good credit established with the micro credit organization could help him get those loans from traditional banks. Borrowers were also encouraged to live according to a code of ethics that encouraged hard work, education, and cooperation between groups of borrowers. Some microfinance organizations even provided entrepreneurial assistance (vocational training, financial planning services, etc.) to borrowers.

Although economic recessions and natural disasters (like the 1998 Bangladesh floods) caused temporary rises in defaults and late payments, micro credit remained largely successful, although it was criticized by finance experts for its relatively high interest rates, and because it was funded largely by charitable contributions and operated on a non-profit basis, which meant that regular subsidies were necessary for its continued operation. Still, it is undeniable that micro credit helped millions of poor people in India and Bangladesh escape dire poverty and give their children a chance to earn a decent living instead of begging on the street or digging through garbage dumps in order to survive.

But over the last few years, a slew of new for-profit micro credit banks backed by prominent financiers (including George Soros) began targeting India's poor with easy loans at cheap interest rates. Borrowers immediately began taking out loans to buy luxury items like cell phones and televisions. Because this new wave of microfinance loans did not require borrowers to use the money to generate an income, borrowers often had no means to make loan payments and ended up borrowing more money in order to pay back earlier loans. In some areas, over 90% of loans are in default.

The biggest problem the poor have with money is that they don't know how to manage it, because they have never had enough to save or invest or otherwise handle through long-term planning. Mohammed Yunus and other micro credit pioneers understood this, and their micro credit banks sought to give borrowers a sense of responsibility and purpose, in addition to money. But this lesson seems lost on the latest generation of microlenders, who looked at the successful repayment rates of Grameen Bank and other micro credit stalwarts and decided that they could make a fortune just by lending money, without offering their borrowers any real plan to overcome poverty.

As much as I support free markets and the profit motive, it seems clear in this case that the non-profit, subsidized model is the correct one to use with respect to microfinance. Is it really wrong to have a sub-system of banking that is subsidized by money earned through traditional banking, when it is clear that there is a group of people that can be helped by the subsidized system, but who would otherwise fail as borrowers from traditional banks?

With the almost certain collapse of the flimsy Indian for-profit micro credit banking system, I fear that it is the poor who will once again suffer, because micro credit will certainly become harder to get, and many deserving people will lose what might have been their only chance to make a better life for their families and for their children.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments (7)

I got as far as Soros' name... (Below threshold)
Sewing Susie:

I got as far as Soros' name and just about slammed my computer desk.
That JACKASS! He is systematically destroying economies around the world, and making himself a gazillionare in the process, and talking about his delusions of godhood ("It is sort of a disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out," [The Independent, June 3, 1993]).
You might know he is behind this whole thing going from a good thing, bringing life to people, to something that is destroying lives.
Shout it from the housetops people--if this guy isn't THE Anti-christ, he sure qualifies.

Hmmmm.......looks like GREE... (Below threshold)

Hmmmm.......looks like GREED triumphs again. As for Soros, he's never contributed or MADE anything in his life. Libs ponder HOW MUCH MONEY DOES ONE PERSON NEED? Yet they never ask Buffett or Soros that question.

Then you get the pandering liberal millionaires who scream they don't pay enough in taxes. They piously appear on lib talk shows so they can preen for the public. Still waiting for the day some host just doesn't come out and say: "Hey! Here's an idea. Why don't you write a check to the IRS right now in front of this audience for $750,000 JUST BECAUSE YOU CAN?" After all, there's no law against it.

Never underestimate the war... (Below threshold)

Never underestimate the warm, fuzzy feeling of offering loans to people of skin shade a bit darker than yours. Since they're somewhat duskier than you, you must've oppressed them somehow in last millenium & such NINJA loans are fair reparations.

Soros again? That vampire squid has his tentacles everywhere.

It is a pity that microlend... (Below threshold)
James H:

It is a pity that microlending went this way. Kenneth Anderson on VC has some details on how the industry works.

Michael, you clearly identi... (Below threshold)

Michael, you clearly identified the problem in your post: "Because this new wave of microfinance loans did not require borrowers to use the money to generate an income..."

Microloans were proving capitalism works, and that a chicken or a bicycle could create a new class: the microbourgeoisie. It's a filthy, rotten shame the class warriors are still trying to give a man a fish (while warning him the fishing pole salesman is trying to hurt his family).

Te sotoros connection is gr... (Below threshold)

Te sotoros connection is greed to the max. What do rich liberals do? Take, take and take some more. I guess its the chicago way.

Where's the Microfinance Co... (Below threshold)

Where's the Microfinance Coercion? Here's the Proof!

The charge of suicide induced by micro-finance institutions had them on the back foot. Their spin-doctors had been working over-time to limit the damage. In a guest post, Ramesh Arunachalam, a MFI practioneer and consultant presents a compilation of what several clients (especially, those with multiple loans) and/or their families told him as he talked to them in various places in Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Orissa and West Bengal. These are evidences part of the report being presented to the Reserve Bank Enquiry on MFIs

Read More: http://devconsultgroup.blogspot.com/2010/11/wheres-coercion-heres-proof.html






Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile


Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links


Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy