« Another Triumph of Border Security | Main | "solve homelessness by mandating everybody to buy a house" »

BREAKING: Obamacare struck down as UnConstitutional by FL Federal Judge

The end of the Beginning or the beginning of the End?  Details to follow.

Because the individual mandate is unconstitutional and not severable, the entire Act must be declared void. This has been a difficult decision to reach, and I am aware that it will have indeterminable implications. At a time when there is virtually unanimous agreement that health care reform is needed in this country, it is hard to invalidate and strike down a statute titled “The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.”


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments (36)

I'm starting to feel better... (Below threshold)

I'm starting to feel better already.

Roy,Amen.... (Below threshold)
Rodney G. Graves:



Don't you just love it when... (Below threshold)

Don't you just love it when SANITY wins?

If this sticks, think of th... (Below threshold)
Pretzel Logic:

If this sticks, think of the campaigning against Barry and the two years of supreme political capital he pissed away on this cluster schtup.

About flippin time someone ... (Below threshold)

About flippin time someone did his job correctly in the government.

Promising, promising, bu... (Below threshold)
gaius piconius:

Promising, promising, but, can the country be this lucky?

at this rate Obama will be ... (Below threshold)

at this rate Obama will be running on a Repeal ObamaCare platform in 2012 ...

Poor Judge is going to have... (Below threshold)

Poor Judge is going to have his whole life splatted all over the front pages and top stories of all the liberal media.

But, hey, this is a good start to getting rid of that monstrosity of a law that no one bothered to read.

Well, let's not start sucki... (Below threshold)
Winston Wolf:

Well, let's not start sucking each other's dicks quite yet. Just last week a court knocked Rahm Emmanuel off the mayor's ballot only to be overturned a couple days later.

It's not over until Diana Ross and the Supremes sing.

Cue the Fat Lady... (Below threshold)

Cue the Fat Lady.

Great idea, when the Dems tweaked the bill before the Senate got it again, they neglected to add a severability clause. That's simple boiler-plate for any legislation thought to be controversial.

Bless their incompetent little hearts.

Its a start, a very GOOD st... (Below threshold)

Its a start, a very GOOD start.

Dems are already saying tha... (Below threshold)
jim m:

Dems are already saying that severability is implied and liberal justices are supporting that reading.

In other words the dems are already saying that it doesn't mater what the law actually say it is what they meant it to say that counts. Fortunately, obama has not yet been able to appoint a majority of justices to the SCOTUS so we might still have a functional rule of law in this country.

I hear liberals grumbling f... (Below threshold)
Peter F.:

I hear liberals grumbling from coast to coast, "Ah....stupid 10th Amendment....who needs it anyway...."

World's safest bet: Tomorro... (Below threshold)

World's safest bet: Tomorrow's NYT will have an article or column about out-of-control judicial activism.

How can Obama focus "like a... (Below threshold)
Sir Toby Belch:

How can Obama focus "like a laser" on JOBS,JOBS,JOBS when Mubarik may be
kabobbed any minute, a judge has just stuck a pin
in his HealthCare balloon, and Olberman
has been canned? I guess he picked the wrong
week to stop smoking.....I'm beginning to
feel for the arrogant clod.

when does HE figure out the... (Below threshold)
Pretzel Logic:

when does HE figure out the Constitution applies to him also?

Not only should the mandate... (Below threshold)

Not only should the mandate disqualify this legislation but when it looks like Obama is on a roll to grant the same number of waivers as there are pages to this bill you pretty much get an idea what a boondoggle this piece of crap is.

Hey Chuckie! which branch o... (Below threshold)

Hey Chuckie! which branch of the government did that?

Looks like an outbreak of c... (Below threshold)
Jay Guevara:

Looks like an outbreak of common sense.

Good thing, or otherwise the next stop would be requiring us to buy Windows Vista.

YES! The B.S. penalty flag ... (Below threshold)

YES! The B.S. penalty flag finally got thrown!

Chip's comment (#8) could q... (Below threshold)
Upset Old Guy:

Chip's comment (#8) could quickly come to pass. It seems the judge referenced Obama's statement during his pre-election run for the presidency to the effect that a mandate was not suitable to solve the health care problem. I guess we might not have to wait too long to see if the msm and liberal pundits retaliate against him.

Individual mandates, 'forci... (Below threshold)
Steve Crickmore:

Individual mandates, 'forcing' people to buy health insurance- whether they can afford it or not, from private insurers was always a dumb idea; the providence of which from the Cato Institute to Romney to Hillary Clinton should have told Obama something. Indeed, he was a strongly against in 2007/8 , before he was for it-

And of course t... (Below threshold)

And of course there's always the possibility that SCOTUS will simply look at this ruling and let it stand.

I'd pay money to see that.

The federal government is t... (Below threshold)
Jeff Blogworthy:

The federal government is the arbiter of its own powers. Has it worked out well so far?

LOUD SCREECH followed by SO... (Below threshold)

LOUD SCREECH followed by SOBBING heard coming from the Office of the House Minority Leader!

Film at 11!

Meanwhile, the White House ... (Below threshold)
jim m:

Meanwhile, the White House doubles down on stupid:

On the White House’s blog, spokeswoman Stephanie Cutter writes: “Today’s ruling – issued by Judge Vinson in the Northern District of Florida – is a plain case of judicial overreaching.” She continues: “Those who claim that the “individual responsibility” provision exceeds Congress’ power to regulate interstate commerce because it penalizes “inactivity” are simply wrong. Individuals who choose to go without health insurance are actively making an economic decision that impacts all of us.”

So are people who don't get mortgages, or buy cars, or use public transportation, or eat broccoli, etc. etc. If Congress can regulate this then by the same logic they can regulate anything and everything.

Now that all 47 GOP Senators have signed on to the repeal bill it will be interesting to see if they can get a handfull of dems to join them. I'd love to see obama telling the us public to go screw as he vetoes the repeal in the face of over half the states suing his administration.

Wonder what the WH spokesho... (Below threshold)

Wonder what the WH spokeshole will say when SCOTUS overturns ObamaCare.

Or does Barry also think he can veto a ruling from them?

Judge Vinson also ruled tha... (Below threshold)
jim m:

Judge Vinson also ruled that the whole of the obamacare law is unconstitutional as it is unseverable.

A fun fact about ObamaCare: Unlike virtually every other federal statute, it contains no “severabililty clause” at the end requesting that if any part of it should be held unconstitutional in court, the rest should be preserved as good law. Vinson actually mentions that fact in the opinion and notes that an earlier draft of the law did contain such a clause, suggesting that it was deliberately dropped because even Congress agrees that you can’t sever any one part from such an elaborate scheme. - (Via Hotair)

This is the first ruling invalidating the whole of the law. The SCOTUS has no choice but to take this up and will likely do so in the next term. I am sure that we can expect a 5 to 4 ruling on this one. I wonder whether we will get to keep our rights or if they will say that Congress has the right to make even the tiniest of decisions for us.

Why do you think Barry call... (Below threshold)

Why do you think Barry called out the Supreme Court last year. Preparing the ground.

LOUD SCREECH followed by... (Below threshold)
Jay Guevara:

LOUD SCREECH followed by SOBBING heard coming from the Office of the House Minority Leader!

Her staff might have neglected to cover a mirror.

The end of the Beginning... (Below threshold)

The end of the Beginning or the beginning of the End?

Neither, clearly. Just another differing opinion in a case that has already had multiple other differing opinions.

Two other federal judges have already upheld the law and a federal judge in Virginia ruled the insurance mandate unconstitutional but stopped short of voiding the entire thing.

I imagine the SCOTUS will have even yet another differing opinion.

You might think that a cons... (Below threshold)

You might think that a constitutional scholar would have been on the look out for this sort of thing.

"when the Dems tweaked t... (Below threshold)

"when the Dems tweaked the bill before the Senate got it again, they neglected to add a severability clause. That's simple boiler-plate for any legislation thought to be controversial."

"Dems are already saying that severability is implied and liberal justices are supporting that reading."

It doesn't matter what the Dems say or what clauses they put in the bill. The mandate is not severable as it was the only way the plan could even begin to work. Now, thoughtful, intelligent people knew that even working at it's best, Obamacare was going to destroy the private insurance companies (as it was ultimately designed to do), but without the mandate the Dems can't even pretend that that wasn't their plan all along.

There is no way the insurance companies could provide all the coverage Obamacare was forcing on them without forcing EVERYONE to pay for it, and pay dearly for it. If you only took away the mandate buy kept the rest of that Marxist piece of shit legislation, everyone who currently does have insurance would see their premiums "necessarily skyrocket", probably by a factor of 5 or more. Actually all but the most wealthy would loose coverage long before then.

Even with the mandate that would have happened, of course. Obama and his comrade's plan all along was to wait until the premiums increased enough to cause everyone to loose their coverage, and then pass their Communist Mandate a.k.a. "Public Option" because they just had no choice-- Barack's teleprompter would have told us all, as he had said, how much they didn't want to do it, you see, but let him be straight with us, they just had no choice.

So it's a very, very good thing that the courts trashed the whole 2000 plus page, anti-American wad of feces and not just the mandate part. The Supreme Court will uphold today's decision-- as bad as things are the big court is still only 4/9th's diehard communist. I figured this would happen all along.

Now we must all pray that the Republicans don't try to replace it with some "compromise" half communist legislation. The Dems did not compromise when they were in power. There are some really good things that can be done to improve our already excellent healthcare system but nothing in Obamacare is worth saving or compromising on. Good riddance.

Remember when Bugeye Pelosi... (Below threshold)
Les Nessman:

Remember when Bugeye Pelosi was asked about the Constitutionality of the bill?
Remember when she said "Are you kidding me? Are you kidding me?"?
Remember how the MSM snickered at anyone who even DARED to bring up the Constitutionality issue? As if it wasn't even a worthy question.
Remember that?

"You might think that a con... (Below threshold)

"You might think that a constitutional scholar would have been on the look out for this sort of thing."

A scholar? Yes. But whoever said he was one?

Oh, that's right. He did.

Technically, he never claim... (Below threshold)
jim m:

Technically, he never claimed it. His sycophants did for him. He taught a class on constitutional law, but the subject matter covered was Alinski class warfare BS.

His most detailed statements on the constitution came on a chicago radio station where he said that the constitution was "seriously flawed" because was a list of "negative rights" that restricted the action of government. He wanted a constitution that declared what rights the government had over the people that they could not stop or defend against.






Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile


Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links


Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy