Mapes Fires Back

Mary Mapes released her own statement today. — reproduced here in its entirety.

STATEMENT OF MARY MAPES

I am terribly disappointed in the conclusions of the report and its effects on the four of us who will no longer work at CBS News. I am disappointed as well for the entire organization. It has been my second family and I will miss my colleagues there.

I am shocked by the vitriolic scape-goating in Les Moonvess statement. I am very concerned that his actions are motivated by corporate and political considerations — ratings rather than journalism. Mr. Moonvess response to the review panels report and the panels assessment of the evidence it developed in its investigation combine not only to condemn me, but to put all investigative reporting in the CBS tradition at risk.

Much has been made about the fact that these documents are photocopies and therefore cannot be trusted, but decades of investigative reporting have relied on just such copies of memos, documents and notes. In vetting these documents, we did not have ink to analyze, original signatures to compare, or paper to date. We did have context and corroboration and believed, as many journalists have before and after our story, that authenticity is not limited to original documents. Photocopies are often a basis for verified stories.

Before the Bush/Guard story aired, the newly found documents that supported it were thoroughly examined and corroborated. The contents of the new documents mesh perfectly, in large ways and small, with all previously known records. The new documents also were corroborated by retired Gen. Bobby Hodges, the late Col. Killians commander, who said that the documents showed Col. Killians true sentiments as well as his actions in the case. After the broadcast, Marian Carr Knox provided the same corroboration in her televised interview. Yet, despite the panels recognition of the heretofore unchalleneged integrity of my work in the past, the panel was quick to condemn me here on the basis of statements of people who told my associates and me very different versions than what they told the panel.

I cooperated fully with the review panel, provided them with more than 1,000 pages of reporting and background materials and answered each and every one of their questions completely and truthfully. To the extent that my answers differed from others statements, I can only emphasize my own honesty and integrity in attempting to reconstruct the details of the days leading up to the storys airing.

It is noteworthy the panel did not conclude that these documents are false. Indeed, in the end, all that the panel did conclude was that there were many red flags that counseled against going to air quickly. I never had control of the timing of any airing of a 60 Minutes segment; that has always been a decision made by my superiors. Airing this story when it did, was also a decision made by my superiors, including Andrew Heyward. If there was a journalistic crime committed here, it was not by me. Those superiors also made the decision to give the White House little time to consider or respond to the Killian documents. Contrary to the conclusions of the panel, I vetted all aspects of the story with my editors. In fact, as I have always done with my editors, I told them everything.

I believe the segment presented to the American people facts they were free to accept or reject, and that as those facts were presented, there was nothing that was false or misleading. I am heartened to see that the panel found no political bias on my part, as indeed I have none. For 25 years, I have built a reputation as a fair, honest and thorough journalist. I have had 15 wonderful years at CBS News and four very bad months. I love and respect the people there and I wish them every good fortune.
January 10, 2005

At some point you have to wonder what planet she is on. She is clearly a member of the moonbat left. Anyone who has read the report -or even the parts I’ve posted here- knows she is either lying or sadly delusional. It really calls into question every piece she has ever done for CBS.

Via Pundit Guy

The End Of "Star Journalism"
"Tiffany:" The name as devolving paradigm

21 Comments

  1. Cybrludite January 11, 2005
  2. Big Bang Hunter January 11, 2005
  3. -S- January 11, 2005
  4. Jezebel January 11, 2005
  5. Steve L. January 11, 2005
  6. Jack Tanner January 11, 2005
  7. Ripper January 11, 2005
  8. Cybrludite January 11, 2005
  9. Old Coot January 11, 2005
  10. jmaster January 11, 2005
  11. Jack Tanner January 11, 2005
  12. The WASP January 11, 2005
  13. JFH January 11, 2005
  14. Chrees January 11, 2005
  15. Jeff January 11, 2005
  16. Gizmo January 11, 2005
  17. Just Lurkin' January 11, 2005
  18. Jim January 11, 2005
  19. BR January 11, 2005
  20. BR January 11, 2005
  21. Jack Tanner January 12, 2005