Blogosphere Politics

For a member of the MSM, Michael Barone really “gets” the blogosphere:

Blogosphere politics

Going into the 2004 election cycle, just about everyone said the Internet was going to change politics. But no one was sure how. Now we know.

The first signs of change came from the Howard Dean campaign. His campaign manager, Joe Trippi, used the Internet and meetup.com and moveon.org to identify and bring together Bush haters from all over the country and raise far more money than anyone expected. Dean rose to the top in the polls and amassed an E-mail list of 600,000 names. When Democratic voters dropped Dean as unelectable and embraced John Kerry as the most readily available instrument to beat George W. Bush, Kerry inherited Dean’s Internet constituency. No one expected the Kerry campaign to raise more money than the Bush campaign. But it did, because of the Internet.

The Democratic Internet constituency was and is motivated by one thing more than anything else: hatred of George W. Bush. To see that you only have to take a look at dailykos.com, run by Democratic consultant Markos Moulitsas, which gets 400,000 page views a day–far more than any other political weblog–and which received funding from the Dean campaign (which Moulitsas disclosed). It seethes with hatred of Bush, constantly attacks Republicans, and excoriates Democrats who don’t oppose Bush root and branch. When four American contractors were killed in Iraq in April 2004, dailykos.com wrote, “I feel nothing over the death of the mercenaries. They are there to wage war for profit. Screw them.” This repulsive comment produced no drop-off in page views. This was what the left blogosphere wanted. Kos was an early enthusiast for Dean’s campaign for Democratic chairman and disparaged other candidates.

For 12 years, Democratic chairmen were chosen by Bill Clinton. He built a new generation of fundraisers who relished contact with the Clintons. Now the big money comes from the left blogosphere and Bush-hating billionaires like George Soros. Dean gives them what they want. As Dean says, “I hate the Republicans and everything they stand for.” Hate. But Bush hatred was not enough to beat Bush in 2004–while Democratic turnout was up, Republican turnout was up more–and doesn’t seem likely to beat Republicans in 2006 and 2008. The left blogosphere has driven the Democrats into an electoral cul de sac.

After discussing the right half of the blogosphere and its distain for the MSM, he concludes…

So what hath the blogosphere wrought? The left blogosphere has moved the Democrats off to the left, and the right blogosphere has undermined the credibility of the Republicans’ adversaries in Old Media. Both changes help Bush and the Republicans.

That about sums it up.

Barone must have spent a fair amount of time reading blogs as he clearly gets the dynamic.. This wasn’t just some clueless reporter doing an obligatory report on those new blog things.

I’ve never really taken the time to consider the net effect of the blogosphere on the partisan divide, but he clearly is correct. The left is driving over a cliff at full speed and the right keeps removing any guard rails that might save them. The blogosphere has helped the Republicans far more than the Democrats… And it shows

THOMAS FRIEDMAN HAS BEEN STIFFING GLUE
Adverse Reactions

15 Comments

  1. Jim February 12, 2005
  2. OneDrummer February 13, 2005
  3. Arne Langsetmo February 13, 2005
  4. Arne Langsetmo February 13, 2005
  5. Jay Tea February 13, 2005
  6. julie February 13, 2005
  7. -S- February 13, 2005
  8. -S- February 13, 2005
  9. -S- February 13, 2005
  10. Rod Stanton February 13, 2005
  11. Just Me February 13, 2005
  12. Paul February 13, 2005
  13. -S- February 13, 2005
  14. AnonymousDrivel February 13, 2005
  15. Henry February 13, 2005