NH gives Sharia law a pass

As more and more nations (most recently Canada) flirt with giving Islamic Sharia law legal standing, allowing Muslims to ignore the established legal systems and settle their grievances through Muslim courts (which, among other notable practices, require any rape charge to be witnessed by two Muslim men, or the woman is often charged with adultery or fornication — which has a death penalty), I spotted an encouraging bit of news in this morning’s paper.

It seems that a couple from Lebanon — Samer and Sonia Ramadan — came to New Hampshire, and while here they decided they didn’t want to be married any more. Under Sharia law, all a husband has to do is say to the wife “Woman, I divorce you” three times. (Apparently the “turn around twice and do the hokey-pokey” requirement has gone by the wayside.) He then jetted back to Lebanon to sign some papers — apparently the wife has nothing to say in this matter.

Sonia disagreed with this approach. Apparently she thought that she ought to have some say in how HER marriage — and, as well, HER children and HER marital assets were to be disposed of. So she filed for divorce in a New Hampshire civil court. Samer refused to recognize the hearing, so it proceeded without him. He appealed, and it went all the way to the New Hampshire Supreme Court.

The court looked carefully at it, and decided that since the Ramadans were in New Hampshire, they had to follow New Hampshire law. Sonia’s divorce was granted and acknowledged superior to Samer’s, and she was awarded the children, child support, alimony, and property.

Even more deliciously ironic, the Court’s ruling was handed down last Tuesday, a little Valentine’s Day present for the lady from the Granite State.

In most cases, New Hampshire recognizes weddings, divorces, and other civil arrangements conducted by other nations. But that tends to presume a certain commonality, a set of shared values and beliefs.

In this case, though, our jurists looked at how Islamic law treats women, and said New Hampshire would have no truck with that sort of thing. No more than we would accept someone bringing slaves into the state, and demanding we acknowledge their rights to own another human being.

Sorry you didn’t care for living in a civilized nation, Samer. Feel free to stay away.

Wizbang Comment Feed
Generation Gap

44 Comments

  1. JohnAnnArbor February 20, 2006
  2. kbiel February 20, 2006
  3. John Burgess February 20, 2006
  4. Muslim Unity February 20, 2006
  5. Robert February 20, 2006
  6. docjim505 February 20, 2006
  7. Cannibal in New Guinea February 20, 2006
  8. SilverBubble February 20, 2006
  9. Aporia February 20, 2006
  10. Aporia February 20, 2006
  11. SCSIwuzzy February 20, 2006
  12. libnani February 20, 2006
  13. jdavenport February 20, 2006
  14. Whitehall February 20, 2006
  15. Matt February 20, 2006
  16. John Burgess February 20, 2006
  17. Aporia February 20, 2006
  18. iPod QA Guy February 20, 2006
  19. CGHill February 20, 2006
  20. jpm100 February 20, 2006
  21. jdavenport February 20, 2006
  22. ed February 20, 2006
  23. Aporia February 21, 2006
  24. Muslim Unity February 21, 2006
  25. Son Of The Godfather February 21, 2006
  26. JimK February 21, 2006
  27. Jay Tea February 21, 2006
  28. LJD February 21, 2006
  29. Jack Burton February 21, 2006
  30. Steve February 21, 2006
  31. Steve February 21, 2006
  32. Aporia February 21, 2006
  33. Kevin M February 21, 2006
  34. Aporia February 21, 2006
  35. SCSIwuzzy February 21, 2006
  36. Nahanni February 21, 2006
  37. jdavenport February 21, 2006
  38. Aporia February 21, 2006
  39. JGrams February 22, 2006
  40. The Sanity Inspector February 24, 2006
  41. BOAZ_David March 2, 2006
  42. Samer Ramadan March 3, 2006
  43. samer ramadan March 6, 2006
  44. fedup April 16, 2006