Clinton On Lieberman — What A Difference A Primary Makes

Jim Hoft has a ton of interesting posts this week at Gateway Pundit. You can literally keep scrolling and scrolling and scrolling. In one post Hoft writes about Bill Clinton’s incredibly quick turn against Joe Lieberman and includes this incredible quote from an ABC News interview earlier this week:

Lieberman has characterized his loss — and the need for his subsequent independent run — as liberals in the party purging those with the Lieberman-Clinton position of progressiveness in domestic politics and strong national security credentials.

“Well, if I were Joe and I was running as an independent, that’s what I’d say, too,” Clinton said.

“But that’s not quite right. That is, there were almost no Democrats who agreed with his position, which was, ‘I want to attack Iraq whether or not they have weapons of mass destruction.'” (Not true… 29 Democratic Senators voted for the War in Iraq, 21 against)

“His position is the Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld position, which was, ‘Does it matter if they have weapons? None of this matters. … This is a big, important priority, and 9/11 gives us the way of attacking and deposing Saddam.'”
Read the entire post and check out all the others at Gateway Pundit.

Scheduling conflicts
More Bush Bashing From The BEEB

22 Comments

  1. MikeSC August 19, 2006
  2. JB August 19, 2006
  3. USMC Pilot August 19, 2006
  4. Actual August 19, 2006
  5. yo August 19, 2006
  6. Justrand August 19, 2006
  7. Chris is Bliss August 19, 2006
  8. Drew August 19, 2006
  9. SCSIwuzzy August 19, 2006
  10. yo August 19, 2006
  11. jainphx August 19, 2006
  12. Actual August 19, 2006
  13. Brian August 19, 2006
  14. yo August 19, 2006
  15. yo August 19, 2006
  16. Brian August 19, 2006
  17. Toby928 August 19, 2006
  18. yo August 19, 2006
  19. Brian August 19, 2006
  20. Joshua August 20, 2006
  21. yo August 20, 2006
  22. Brian August 20, 2006