Defending the Weird Guy : Why I Support Tom Cruise

I do not like Tom Cruise. Frankly, like many Hollywood types he gets on my nerves, with his better-than-you attitude and flaunting his wealth and success. I also think Scientology is a crock religion, and people like Cruise are selling folks on a false faith. Having said that, I support Cruise in the clash with Viacom, and contend that his rights have been abused.

Here’s the short story: For the last couple years or so, Cruise has been acting like the mascot for Froot Loops, jumping on sofas, attacking ‘South Park’ for having some fun – Tom, get a grip, it’s a CARTOON – and generally saying things which bring up concerns for Tom’s mental balance. On that basis, Viacom Fuhrer – er, Chairman Summer Redstone cut ties between his company, which owns Paramount Pictures, and Tom Cruise.
Said Redstone of Cruise; “His recent conduct has not been acceptable to Paramount.”

I see. Well, that drunk driving incident with the accompanying anti-Semitic slurs certainly was damaging. Wait, sorry, that was Mel Gibson. Cruise has never been arrested for driving drunk, in fact I’m not sure he even drinks anymore.

OK, well that throw-the-phone-at-the-hotel-employee was pretty classless. Except that Russell Crowe did that, not Cruise.

Hmm. Maybe the time the costume “malfunctioned” on national television – no, that was Janet Jackson.

What’s interesting is that while they faced some controversy, those three celebrities I just mentioned all got on with their lives and careers. Not one studio has even hinted at kicking them out. So what’s different with Cruise? His religion.

I already said I think Scientology is a quack-fest, but everyone has a right to their personal beliefs. Scientology has never, so far as I know, started a war, which puts it morally ahead of certain Christian, Muslim, and even Buddhist sects. I tend to think of Scientologists much the same way as I do Mormons – Brigham Young and Joseph Smith, after all, were no saints, but many Mormons are fine people whose good works and character are worthy of admiration and imitation.

But I said at the start that I think Redstone is abusing Tom Cruise’s rights. What I mean is, Hollywood definitely sells a perspective. They don’t mind in the least if an actor or actress acts in a way which most people would consider lewd or promiscuous. They don’t mind if an actor or actress attacks mainstream values, so long as they express the appropriate liberal alternative. They do not have any beef with someone who is hedonistic and vain, especially if it increases box office sales. But god help the actor, so to speak, who dares to express religious thoughts and opinions in public. The First Amendment never reached the West Coast, it seems. Tom Cruise may be a self-obsessed actor with a poor grasp of tact and poor tolerance for satire, but he still has rights. Even in Hollywood.

Wizbang Redesign Update
Mark Steyn is Guest Hosting for Rush Limbaugh Today

28 Comments

  1. Justin B August 24, 2006
  2. scsiwuzzy August 24, 2006
  3. jim August 24, 2006
  4. mantis August 24, 2006
  5. Matt August 24, 2006
  6. Darleen August 24, 2006
  7. grnapl August 24, 2006
  8. Rick August 24, 2006
  9. Wayne August 24, 2006
  10. Malibu Stacy August 24, 2006
  11. SicSemperTyrannus August 24, 2006
  12. JohnAnnArbor August 24, 2006
  13. ElvenPhoenix August 24, 2006
  14. JannyMae August 24, 2006
  15. Ex-Voto August 24, 2006
  16. Chris August 24, 2006
  17. yetanotherjohn August 24, 2006
  18. Lizzie August 24, 2006
  19. Synova August 24, 2006
  20. LenS August 24, 2006
  21. Matt August 24, 2006
  22. JimK August 24, 2006
  23. JD August 24, 2006
  24. Synova August 24, 2006
  25. mantis August 25, 2006
  26. Tom Cruise August 25, 2006
  27. Tom Cruise August 27, 2006
  28. d e s August 30, 2006