The folks at the UN, some of the most corrupt people on the face of the earth, are cheering the Republicans’ losses.
Daniel Freedman at It Shines for All comments:
Why is the U.N. commenting on member state elections? We’re told that this isn’t normally done. So why is the Republican loss worthy? It’s almost celebratory. Does the U.N. think they’ll get more support now?
And look who the U.N. quotes. Largely leftwing press. AP, BBC, NYT … And the one editorial they quote? The New York Times. Go figure. (Why anyway is an editorial worth including? It’s certainly not “morning headlines” it’s “morning opinion.”)
And that’s how American taxpayer dollars are used at the United Nations.
Hat tip: Michelle Malkin
Update:Bookworm at Webloggin links to this MSNBC article which reports that European socialists are very happy that Bush got his:
Regardless of the effect on world events, global giddiness that Bush was finally handed a political black-eye was almost palpable.
In an extraordinary joint statement, more than 200 Socialist members of the European Parliament hailed the American election results as “the beginning of the end of a six-year nightmare for the world” and gloated that they left the Bush administration “seriously weakened.”
In London’s Guardian newspaper, commentator Martin Kettle wrote: “The cheering can be heard not just in America itself but around the planet.”
Socialists happy that Democrats win. Sounds right.
Muslim Unity,
Yes, peace is priceless!
Thank you. I have joined.
John
Uh…Muslim Unity?
The 60’s called….they want you back.
Once again, Muslim, just like Lee and the rest cannot answer a simple question. Why, because they’re traitors themselves – supporting and aiding the enemy.
Muslim Unity
The fact that total American hegemony has been challenged by the rise of other powers is one thing. But to say that Americans are becoming more humane is quite another. There has always been a majority of Americans whose instincts preferred peace over war. But corporate American media have always been able to reverse those instincts by stirring up fears about non-existent threats – like an invasion from those superpowers Grenada or Nicaragua, or “communists” like Iran and Indonesia. No matter how outrageous the lie, wall-to-wall media smears always manage to convince enough Americans that their very existence and way of life are at stake from whichever pitifully small and weak Third World nation happens to be the designated enemy of the day.
cat,
Wow! You are from ALL of those countries?
Or perhaps you just presume to speak for all of those countries.
My question, hopefully more clearly for you this time, is what country are you from?
Now with President Ortega confirmed elected yesterday, the Left has had its day.
Now, if they could only govern . . .
cat, you aren’t even an American.
Cat’s probably Canadian, eh?
Muslim,
I know you’re embarressed, but at least you learned something. You don’t have to answer the question because you know you’re wrong and so do we.
theExecutioner,
They bombed us? Which one of the one billion muslems bombed us exactly, cause I’m just trying to figure out which ones and how many we’ll have to kill before we’re satisfied.
First off, “they” do not hate us for our freedom. Until you lose that notion, you will never undertand the issue.
“They” hate us for our foreign policy.
My guess is you don’t understand that a major cause of the 9-11 attack relates to the US establishing military bases in Saudia Arabia, which helped set up the current conflict between Osama and the US government.
My guess is that you don’t know that this policy is Bush the first and not Clinton. My guess is that you think Clinton somehow appeased people, and that lead to the 9-11 attacks.
My guess is that you buy into the “they hate our freedom argument”.
And my guess is that you’ll never really understand what’s going on.
Since “They” bombed us and killed 3,000 people, then “We” killed 600,000 of “them”, what do you think the next move is likley to be if we keep on the same course?
As they say “If you keep doin’ what you done, you keep getting what you got”
It’s enough death for me. Destruction. Chaos.
So much better to make nice.
John
If that’s what you wanted to know, Sheik, you should have said. Sorry, I’ll leave you guessing. What’s far more important to most of us out here is which countries have you bombed and invaded? Which countries have you launched terrorist campaigns against? Which countries’ leaders have you murdered? Which countries’ torturers and death squads have you trained?
“They” hate us for our foreign policy.
nope….they hate us because we are not muslim and want to behead those who are not muslim.
VagaBond,
Then you will never understand the issue. Muslims have lived peacefully side by side with Christans, Buddhists, Jews, etc for long periods of history.
The average American muslim does not want to cut your head off.
The average non-American muslim may have some frustration. It’s policy based.
I’m guessing you don’t know any muslims. I have a few friends and co-workers. I’ve never felt that my head may have been seperated at any time.
You don’t understand the issue. Until you do, you’ll never be able to make good decisions about how to deal with it.
John
John –
“They bombed us? Which one of the one billion muslems bombed us exactly”
Well, lets see… Who’s blowing up our troops every day? There are wanted posters too. Take a look sometime.
“”They” hate us for our foreign policy.”
Yes, Clinton was the worst president ever and I know that that is why they trained themselves to fly planes during his administration.
“then “We” killed 600,000 of “them””
WHEN was that and WHAT are you smoking?
As I said, you terrorist sympathizers cannot answer my simple question and you embarress yourselves every time you post. And by the way, are YOU an American?
OK, what’s your simple question. I’ll take a stab at answering it.
John, Muslim seems to think that if we could just love them in peace we would not be attacked. That is EXACTLY what Clinton did. He sent Marilyn Albright in love and peace. But all we got were 9-11 bombings as they trained to fly the planes during the Clinton years. Clinton and Albright proved that being nice didn’t work.
———
Muslim, are you a terrorist thinking that you can make me forget about all the terror attacks before 9-11 when Clinton did NOTHING but love them and not bomb them?
Well, you can’t.
So WHY did 9-11 happen? HUH?
Posted by: theExecutioner at November 8, 2006 02:40 PM
Again, WHY did the 9-11 bombings occur after Clinton had done NOTHING but be nice? That is my question.
cat:
Your post is extremely ignorant, over-generalised and and a few cases, outright false.
From exactly what vast pool of knowlege and experience do you draw your information from? I believe you should change the water…it’s been polluted.
Heralder, cat is NOT an American. He is here merely to support the Democrats and bash America.
“They” hate us for our foreign policy.
No, this view of why terrorism exists is naive and simplistic. True, while it may be perceived (or even proven partially true) that our foreign policy in the Middle East is at the heart of all Middle East terrorism, it is simply not the greater cause of it. The root causes for terrorism are far more complex than just reducing it to self-flaggelating notion that “it’s all our fault; we’re the ones to blame”. You’re simply not accounting for or excusing the present repressive states of government in the MIddle East, the lack of capitalism that breeds prosperity instead of abject poverity and anger, the lack of democracy that encourages peace with neighbors instead of violence and the lack of education and discouraging of open thought that pormotes understanding and peace of others.
I’ll give you that some of our foreign policy decisions have not been the best at times. But when do you hold them–Muslims at large and their governments–accountable for their actions? Moreover, have our foreign policy decisions truly justified rank terrorism and the murder of innocents since Munich in 1972? I honestly do not see how you can hold that position with a straight face.
OK, Executioner… I’ve gotta go get lunch, but I’ll take a stab at this. Muslim Unity may have a different answer, but here’s mine…
You said…
“John, Muslim seems to think that if we could just love them in peace we would not be attacked. That is EXACTLY what Clinton did. He sent Marilyn Albright in love and peace. But all we got were 9-11 bombings as they trained to fly the planes during the Clinton years. Clinton and Albright proved that being nice didn’t work.”
OK, you realize that the LARGEST terrorist attack in the United States, prior to 9-11 was by a white, male, military veteran, when he bombed a federal building with a truck bomb?
Soooo….. start killing white male military veterans?
Before that it was a white male college professor…
Some people are just crazy. But even crazy people have something that sets them off. Otherwise, they’d be at home counting their hair.
A dozen people did a horrible thing. The other billion people did not.
Yeah, loving people is a lot more effective. If I’m your neigbor and I drop by with the occasional bottle of wine, or casserole, or mow your lawn when you are sick, or watch your house when you are out of town, we’re good buds, yes?
So, you also asked…
“Muslim, are you a terrorist thinking that you can make me forget about all the terror attacks before 9-11 when Clinton did NOTHING but love them and not bomb them?”
First off, that’s not quite true, but yes… You will need to get over it. Did Jesus not say to turn the other cheek? What did you think he meant by that?
And you also said;
“Well, you can’t.”
Then you will forever be lost, wandering in the wilderness.
Almost done;
“So WHY did 9-11 happen? HUH?”
Because of our foreign policy, and partialy because of US military bases in Saudia Arabia after the first gulf war which set off Osam who is a nut job.
And finaly;
“Again, WHY did the 9-11 bombings occur after Clinton had done NOTHING but be nice? That is my question.”
Invalid question. Use “The Google” to search “The Internets”. 9-11 happened because GWB ignored the outgoing transition team, and his own intelegence teams. It happened because he was lazy, was on vacation, and because he did not do a good job on his watch.
Your questions are now answered.
John
“Soooo….. start killing white male military veterans?”
I have NEVER suggested killing innocent Muslims. I have good friends that are muslims. Do NOT insult me with such a suggestion.
“Did Jesus not say to turn the other cheek? What did you think he meant by that?”
Jesus was still alive to turn His other cheek.
“”Well, you can’t.” Then you will forever be lost, wandering in the wilderness.”
I am NOT opposed to forgiving OBL himself IF he is truely repentant. Until then, I will NEVER forget 9-11
“Invalid question.”
No. You aren’t getting off that easy. My point was that Clinton did NOTHING but appease the terrorists yet 9-11 still happened. GW BUSH DIDN’T FLY THE PLANES INTO THE TWIN TOWERS AND THE PENTIGON. TERRORISTS DID.
You lost and Musliim can’t answer it either because PEACE AND LOVE will NOT STOP TERRORISM.
Why did Muslim run and hide? Because he knows he’s wrong. You cannot appease a terrorist.
The average American muslim does not want to cut your head off.
John, the only religious group I know of that is currently beheading people is the Muslims. If I were your american muslim friend, I would be condemning a faction of my religion who chops off the heads of infedels. Can you tell which muslim will chop off your head and which one won’t? Until you can, YOU don’t understand the issue.
VagaBond,
What you said!!
John,
I suggest you go talk to Muslim after Muslim until you find the ones who want to cut our heads off. Then come back and tell us which ones they are. OK?
cat,
It’s a simple question. If you aren’t willing to answer it, I must presume you don’t want an honest debate and will have to view you as a troll.
Your choice.
cat is not an American. He supports the terrrorists.
Just like Lee, MuslimUnity cannot back up their arguments.
theExecutioner,
9-11 did not happen when Clinton was president. Please stop being thick. The roots of 9-11 go back to Bush the first. 9-11 happend when Bush the second was president.
Vagabond and Sheik Yur Bouty,
You’ve both asked a similar question. To answer, the jewish state Israel kills far more muslims than muslims kill jews, by about 6 or 7 to one.
Our American “christian” government kills it’s “enemies” at a rate of about 50 to one. Does it matter if I chop a head off, or just blow it off?
John
Ask a simple question of the Anti-Americans like Muslim and John and they cut and run. Debating you turds is WAY too easy.
You’ve both asked a similar question. To answer, the jewish state Israel kills far more muslims than muslims kill jews, by about 6 or 7 to one.
where did you get that statistic? wikipedia? you mean muslims who lob bombs over at Israel and they retaliate?
Our American “christian” government kills it’s “enemies” at a rate of about 50 to one.
Convoluted logic. It’s what I would expect when confronted with facts you can’t refute. and besides, if we are killing our enemies, I would want that ratio a LOT higher.
But at least you admit that the beheading muslims are our enemies.
9-11 did not happen when Clinton was president. Please stop being thick. The roots of 9-11 go back to Bush the first. 9-11 happend when Bush the second was president.
Your basic assertion is that, well, Clinton had nothing to do with 9/11, is that what you’re saying? As if 8 years of history simply doesn’t exist or near do-nothing/containment of terrorism on the part of Clinton doesn’t make him accountable and greatly responsible for 9/11? You’ve got to be kidding…
. To answer, the jewish state Israel kills far more muslims than muslims kill jews, by about 6 or 7 to one.
Falling back on the old “it’s all the fault of Joooos” screed, are we? Nice rheotorical try, but it fails miserably.
Finally, your previous citation of the 600,000 killed in the Iraq War that’s claimed by the statistically bogus Lancet is, in a word, crap. Even Lancet said their study is skewed and likely (ha!) wrong. Hell, their statistical sample is so incredibly flawed it’s hard to even know where to begin. But that doesn’t matter. People on the Left like to assert and claim that we (the Coalition, not the terrorists) are responsible for all 600,000. But there’s one big fucking difference they fucking leave out of their “study”: Terrorists target civilians on purpose; we target terrorists to kill terrorists. In short, we kill the bad guys; they kill the innocent. Got it? Good. Now stop quoting that goddamn study…
Peter,
No, my assertion was that only Bush could be lazy enough to let 9-11 happen. He had lots of information and plenty of time to react, and he just didn’t care. It didn’t happen when Clinton was in charge. Just didn’t.
No, it’s not the joooos fault. Don’t you be thick now. Look at the death toll since the start of the Intifada in 2000, then come back and report.
OK, I’d like you to put out some facts. Show everyone the reference where the Lancet states that the Iraqi mortality study is “likley wrong”. I heard an extensive interview with the study author, and I’ve got enough of a background in experiment design and analysis and statistics to understand that his statistical sample is not so flawed that you should be left unable to understand where to begin.
Finaly, I heard an extensive interview with one of the people on the high value targeting team during the latest Iraq war. He states that the US team is willing to kill up to 30 innocient people to take out one high value target, eg bad guy, bridge, building, etc.
So yes, we do kill innocients. In fact we know exactly how many we are willing to kill to blow up a bridge or a building, or kill a bad guy. The answer is 30.
John
John, learn to read. I never said 9-11 happened during Clinton. I said that the terrorists were PLANNING the attack during Clinton. Unlike what Muslim said, it’s NOT Bush’s policy that CAUSED it. Good grief!! How dumb can u people be???
theExecutioner,
So we’re clear, 9-11 did not happen during Clinton… I didn’t say it. You didn’t say it.
I think we can agree on that.
So, 9-11 DID happen during George Walker Bush’s presidency.
The conditions that put Osama bin Forgotten off his rocker were created during George Herbert Walker Bush’s presidency.
They planned it for many years, but the opportunity that made the 9-11 attack possible was set up by the laziness of George Walker Bush. The policy that started the planning for 9-11 was created by George Herbert Walker Bush.
John
“john” as in crapper, commode,toilet, etc.
“mooselum” U–no words for this fraud.
jhow66,
I bow to your superior logic, and beaten, I withdraw from this field of battle.
But I’ll be back.
I’LL BE BACK, jhow66, you… you….
You BOOGER HEAD, you!