But that was then and this is now

Obama in 2007:

The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.

As Commander-in-Chief, the President does have a duty to protect and defend the United States. In instances of self-defense, the President would be within his constitutional authority to act before advising Congress or seeking its consent. History has shown us time and again, however, that military action is most successful when it is authorized and supported by the Legislative branch. It is always preferable to have the informed consent of Congress prior to any military action.

So we must conclude that he was for Congressional consent before he was against it.

And now, in addition to upsetting Louis Farrakhan, he’s done gone and upset yet another moonbat.

It’s nearly enough to make you feel sorry for the guy.

Nearly.

A Quick Guide on Who to Support in the Middle East
The Iron Spine of NATO